On Tue, 14 May 2013, schmitz wrote:
> > - mac: ADB raw packets
> > I guess this can be dropped?
Geert, you should drop this patch, because there are no other patches in
your queue that use ADBREQ_RAW and because it seems to be broken (the idea
of sending a raw packet using adb_request() was apparently to permit
req->data[0] != ADB_PACKET). Also it seems to have become obsolete back in
2006.
>
> I'd guess so - I struggle to recall what this was for. Perhaps to talk
> to the clock chip on some Macs.
I went digging in the mac68k repo. ADBREQ_RAW shows up here:
"Latest ADB changes including the new 68k PMU driver."
http://linux-mac68k.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/linux-mac68k/linux-mac68k/drivers/macintosh/adb.c?r1=1.15&r2=1.16&;
"Added Baboon interrupt support.
Moved all time and PRAM-related functions into misc.c."
http://linux-mac68k.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/linux-mac68k/linux-mac68k/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c?r1=1.4&r2=1.5&;
You are right, ADBREQ_RAW was clearly PRAM and clock related.
And this seems to indicate roughly when it got broken:
"Merge with 2.4.0 release."
http://linux-mac68k.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/linux-mac68k/linux-mac68k/drivers/macintosh/adb.c?r1=1.21&r2=1.22
Anyway, in mainline kernels, adb_request() was not called from the PRAM
and clock related code since 2006 when Al Viro got that code to build
again:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c?id=3272244c2b1a8f13cec83c04b8245fa7fcb47a27
Finn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
