Hi Vinod and Geert, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:39:13PM +0530, Vinod wrote: > On 28-06-18, 09:43, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Vinod, > > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:29 AM Vinod <vk...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On 28-06-18, 08:50, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 8:29 AM Vinod <vk...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > On 22-06-18, 11:44, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_EP93XX_DMA) += ep93xx_dma.o > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_DMA) += fsldma.o > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_EDMA) += fsl-edma.o fsl-edma-common.o > > > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MCF_EDMA) += mcf-edma.o fsl-edma-common.o > > > > > > > > > > that makes kernel have two copies of common.o one in thsi driver and > > > > > one > > > > > > > > Does it? It's a common pattern in several Makefiles (e.g. > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/8390/Makefile and drivers/scsi/Makefile) > > > > > > won't each static symbol be part each one? > > > > Remember, obj-y is a list, and IIRC it's filtered for duplicates. > > > > > What about when they are modules? > > > > Same thing, you'll have fsl-edma-common.ko, and fsl-edma.ko and/or > > mcf-edma.ko. > > Yeah that is right, I missed the list part >
Ok, so if i understand, i'll fix all the Vinod points except the Kconfig/makefile part that seems ok as is. Vinod, what do you think, am i near to a possible "accept" in a v6 or v7 ? Or do you see any additional great job to do or other important blocking points ? Thanks, regards, Angelo Dureghello > -- > ~Vinod > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
