On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:09:51 +0100
Carsten Meier <c...@trexity.de> wrote:

> Am Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:47:50 -0200
> schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@infradead.org>:
> 
> > For usb devices, usb_make_path() provide a canonical name for the
> > device. For PCI ones, we have pci_name() for the same function. in
> > the case of pci devices, I suspect that all use pci_name(). We just
> > need to use usb_make_path() at the usb ones. 
> >   
> 
> I looked at the sources for what string gets generated for bus_info by
> usb_make_path(). If it gets used by pvrusb2, my problems are solved,
> because it is constant across standby-wake-up-cycles. The pvrusb2's
> implementation currently delivers "usb 7-2 address 6" here. "address
> 6" corresponds to devnum which gets constantly increased, which results
> in always changing strings here. Sorry for my unneccessary complaints.

Mike, Thierry, Jean-Francois, Laurent and others:

IMO, we should patch all usb drivers to use usb_make_path(). It will be more
transparent to userspace, if all drivers provide the bus_info using the same
notation. Comments?

Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to