Hi Robert, On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de> writes: > > > This is more or less the final version of the first step of the > > v4l2-subdev conversion, hence, all affected driver authors / platform > > maintainers are encouraged to review and test. I have eliminated > > OK, here goes a preliminary review for the bits I maintain. I'll test fully > this > weekend. Great, thanks. > As a side note, I tried to apply your patch on top of linux-next-20090406. I > was > a bit tedious. Would you tell me which tree you're based against, or even > better > some git url ? Look under http://gross-embedded.homelinux.org/~lyakh/v4l-20090408/ that's based on linux-next of 30.03.2009 (commit ID in 0000-base on linux-next history branch). > <snip> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c > > index 97c93a7..5c8aabf 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c > > @@ -724,19 +724,19 @@ struct pxacamera_platform_data > > mioa701_pxacamera_platform_data = { > > .mclk_10khz = 5000, > > }; > > > > -static struct soc_camera_link iclink = { > > - .bus_id = 0, /* Must match id in pxa27x_device_camera in device.c */ > > -}; > > - > > /* Board I2C devices. */ > I would rather have : > /* > * Board I2C devices > */ > The remaining /* blurpblurg */ forms are a leftover in device comments. > > <snip> > > @@ -754,20 +754,21 @@ static struct platform_device var = { > > \ > > .platform_data = pdata, \ > > .parent = tparent, \ > > }, \ > > -}; > > +} > No cookie for you for removing that semi-colon. I believe this is correct. It is good to have #define macro(x) do_something(x) and then use macro(x1); macro(x2); rather than #define macro(x) do_something(x); macro(x1) macro(x2) And you do have semicolons everywhere where you use MIO_PARENT_DEV and MIO_SIMPLE_DEV, so, probably, that change doesn't belong to this patch, but it is correct. > > #define MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(var, strname, pdata) \ > > MIO_PARENT_DEV(var, strname, NULL, pdata) > > > > -MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_gpio_keys, "gpio-keys", > > &mioa701_gpio_keys_data) > > +MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_gpio_keys, "gpio-keys", > > &mioa701_gpio_keys_data); > > MIO_PARENT_DEV(mioa701_backlight, "pwm-backlight", > > &pxa27x_device_pwm0.dev, > > &mioa701_backlight_data); > > -MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_led, "leds-gpio", &gpio_led_info) > > -MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(pxa2xx_pcm, "pxa2xx-pcm", NULL) > > -MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(pxa2xx_ac97, "pxa2xx-ac97", NULL) > > -MIO_PARENT_DEV(mio_wm9713_codec, "wm9713-codec", &pxa2xx_ac97.dev, NULL) > > -MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_sound, "mioa701-wm9713", NULL) > > -MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_board, "mioa701-board", NULL) > > +MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_led, "leds-gpio", &gpio_led_info); > > +MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(pxa2xx_pcm, "pxa2xx-pcm", NULL); > > +MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(pxa2xx_ac97, "pxa2xx-ac97", NULL); > > +MIO_PARENT_DEV(mio_wm9713_codec, "wm9713-codec", &pxa2xx_ac97.dev, > > NULL); > > +MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_sound, "mioa701-wm9713", NULL); > > +MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_board, "mioa701-board", NULL); > > MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(gpio_vbus, "gpio-vbus", &gpio_vbus_data); > Please, don't change the indentation. You will face : > (a) conficts with patches in this merge window > (b) that's not the object of your patch anyway > (c) I like that indentation in that very specific case > > > +MIO_SIMPLE_DEV(mioa701_camera, "soc-camera-pdrv",&&iclink[0]); > ^ > isn't &iclink enough ? Oops, yeah, sure. > > static struct platform_device *devices[] __initdata = { > > &mioa701_gpio_keys, > > @@ -781,6 +782,7 @@ static struct platform_device *devices[] __initdata = { > > &strataflash, > > &gpio_vbus, > > &mioa701_board, > > + &mioa701_camera, > Please invert mioa701_board and mioa701_camera. The board should always be > last > for suspend/resume purpose (yes, that would have deserved a comment, I hear > you > :)) ok > > }; > > > > static void mioa701_machine_exit(void); > > @@ -825,7 +827,6 @@ static void __init mioa701_machine_init(void) > > > > pxa_set_i2c_info(&i2c_pdata); > > pxa_set_camera_info(&mioa701_pxacamera_platform_data); > > - i2c_register_board_info(0, ARRAY_AND_SIZE(mioa701_i2c_devices)); > I'm wondering which version of mioa701.c had that line ... strange ... commit 8e7ccddf0fd22617a3edc28ab2ce2fac0fb94823 Author: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> Date: Sat Nov 15 16:09:54 2008 +0100 [ARM] pxa/MioA701: add camera support for Mio A701 board. > > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mt9m111.c b/drivers/media/video/mt9m111.c > > index cdd1ddb..425aec2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/video/mt9m111.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/video/mt9m111.c > <snip> > > @@ -938,40 +955,42 @@ static int mt9m111_video_probe(struct > > soc_camera_device *icd) > > > > dev_info(&icd->dev, "Detected a MT9M11x chip ID %x\n", data); > > > > - ret = soc_camera_video_start(icd); > > - if (ret) > > - goto eisis; > > - > > mt9m111->autoexposure = 1; > > mt9m111->autowhitebalance = 1; > > > > mt9m111->swap_rgb_even_odd = 1; > > mt9m111->swap_rgb_red_blue = 1; > > > > - return 0; > > -eisis: > > ei2c: > > + soc_camera_video_stop(icd); > > + > > return ret; > > } > > > > static void mt9m111_video_remove(struct soc_camera_device *icd) > > { > > - struct mt9m111 *mt9m111 = container_of(icd, struct mt9m111, icd); > > + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(icd->control); > > > > - dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "Video %x removed: %p, %p\n", mt9m111->client->addr, > > - mt9m111->icd.dev.parent, mt9m111->icd.vdev); > > - soc_camera_video_stop(&mt9m111->icd); > > + dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "Video %x removed: %p, %p\n", client->addr, > > + icd->dev.parent, icd->vdev); > > + icd->ops = NULL; > I don't understand the icd->ops = NULL here. It's not symmetrical with > mt9m111_video_probe. Shouldn't that be in mt9m111_remove ? *_video_remove is called from *_remove now, so, doesn't matter really. > More generally, I saw all the heavy work on mt9m111 driver conversion. I > wondered if there shouldn't be a wrapper function to convert an icd structure > into an mt9m111 structre. If I had done that straight away, you wouldn't have > had that much work ... Well, it was about the same for all device drivers, so... But at least your reg_{read,write,set,clear} macros did help in a later patch:-) Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
