On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 12:26:38PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Magnus Damm <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is V2 of the V4L2 videobuf-dma-contig USERPTR zero copy patch.
>
> I guess the V4L2 specific bits are pretty simple.
>
> As for the minor mm modifications below,
>
> > --- 0001/mm/memory.c
> > +++ work/mm/memory.c 2009-04-28 14:56:43.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -3009,7 +3009,6 @@ int in_gate_area_no_task(unsigned long a
> >
> > #endif /* __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA */
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
> > int follow_phys(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long address, unsigned int flags,
> > unsigned long *prot, resource_size_t *phys)
>
> Is it ok with the memory management guys to always build follow_phys()?
AFAICS, pte_pgprot is only defined on three architectures that have
the config symbol above set. It shouldn't compile on the others.
I have a patch that factors out follow_pte and builds follow_pfn and
follow_phys on top of that. I can send it monday, no access to it
from here right now.
Then we can keep follow_phys private to this configuration.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
