Em Tue, 12 May 2009 17:18:20 -0400
Devin Heitmueller <[email protected]> escreveu:

> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:39 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
> >
> > Fix &&/|| typo. `default_norm' can be 0 (PAL), 1 (NTSC) or 2 (SECAM),
> > the condition tested was impossible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > ---
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Was the patch actually tested against the hardware in question?  While
> I agree that it looks ok, it can result in the default logic being
> inverted in some cases, which could expose other bugs and result in a
> regression.
> 
> I just want to be confident that this patch was tested by somebody
> with the hardware and it isn't going into the codebase because "it
> obviously cannot be right".

Hans and Jean worked on it. Both are at PAL area, so they won't notice such
error without a standards generator, since the default is to assume that the
signal is PAL.

With this patch, PAL should keep working, but I can't see how NTSC or SECAM
would work without it.

Anyway, this patch were already committed on our tree, and it is on my
linux-next tree since yesterday night.

Hans,

Could you please confirm that the patch is ok with your standards generator?



Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to