I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c 
b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c
index b975da0..ae44abc 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static bool is_qam(struct drxk_state *state)
 #define DRXK_QAM_SL_SIG_POWER_QAM256      (43520)
 
 static unsigned int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "enable debug messages");
 
 #define dprintk(level, fmt, arg...) do {                               \
-- 
2.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to