On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:46:51PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:21:05PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On 02/27/2017 06:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > I'm afraid that I walked away from this after it became clear that there > > > was little hope for any forward progress being made in a timely manner > > > for multiple reasons (mainly the core CEC code being out of mainline.) > > > > In case you missed it: the core CEC code was moved out of staging and into > > mainline in 4.10. > > I was aware (even though I've not been publishing anything, I do keep > dw-hdmi-cec and tda9950/tda998x up to date with every final kernel > release.) > > > > If you can think of a better approach, then I'm sure there's lots of > > > people who'd be willing to do the coding for it... if not, I'm not > > > sure where we go from here (apart from keeping code in private/vendor > > > trees.) > > > > For CEC there are just two things that it needs: the physical address > > (contained in the EDID) and it needs to be informed when the EDID disappears > > (typically due to a disconnect), in which case the physical address > > becomes invalid (f.f.f.f). > > Yep. CEC really only needs to know "have new phys address" and > "disconnect" provided that CEC drivers understand that they may receive > a new phys address with no intervening disconnect. (Consider the case > where EDID changes, but the HDMI driver failed to spot the HPD signal > pulse - unfortunately, there's hardware out there where HPD is next to > useless.)
Ok, simplifying the CEC stuff like that would be a lot better I think, to avoid overlap with other in-kernel interfaces. I still have some questions, but this might be my misunderstanding of how CEC works: I thought that CEC is driven through a special separate wire in the HDMI bus, with the receiver in the TV. Which means that we'd have a 1:1 relationship between HDMI connector and CEC port. That's at least the use-case I've heard of for Intel boards. Are there other use-cases where we do not have a 1:1 relationship between HDMI connector and CEC port? Imo notifier really only makes sense as a quick&dirty hack, or if you really have n:m for at least one of n,m != 1. Otherwise some very specific callback service which just provides the information the CEC side needs seems like a much better idea to me. > > Russell, do you have pending code that needs the ELD support in the > > notifier? CEC doesn't need it, so from my perspective it can be > > dropped in the first version. > > I was looking for that while writing the previous mail, and I think > it's time to drop it - I had thought dw-hdmi-*audio would use it, or > the ASoC people, but it's still got no users, so I think it's time > to drop it. For ELD I'd definitely say let's please use the hdmi-codec.h. It's what's in tree, so better to converge on one solution instead of proliferating even more. The entire sad story of multiple people inventing similar wheels without talking with each another is water down the river, can't fix that anymore :( > I have seen some patch sets go by which are making use of the notifier, > but I haven't paid close attention to how they're using it or what > they're using it for... as I sort of implied in my previous mail, I > had lost interest in mainline wrt CEC stuff due to the glacial rate > of progress. (That's not a criticism.) Maybe some docs that would describe the flow we want to achieve here would help? Doesn't need to be more than a few lines, but reconstructing that from the various driver patches later on is indeed hard. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
