There is no reason for all this printk spamming and certainly not at an error log level.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> --- drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c index 6dd466558701..3cabfe54c669 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c @@ -1191,9 +1191,8 @@ static int ov2680_detect(struct i2c_client *client) OV2680_SC_CMMN_SUB_ID, &high); revision = (u8) high & 0x0f; - dev_err(&client->dev, "sensor_revision id = 0x%x\n", id); - dev_err(&client->dev, "detect ov2680 success\n"); - dev_err(&client->dev, "################5##########\n"); + dev_info(&client->dev, "sensor_revision id = 0x%x\n", id); + return 0; } @@ -1448,8 +1447,6 @@ static int ov2680_probe(struct i2c_client *client, void *pdata; unsigned int i; - printk("++++ov2680_probe++++\n"); - dev_info(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_probe++++\n"); dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); if (!dev) { dev_err(&client->dev, "out of memory\n"); -- 2.13.0