There is no reason for all this printk spamming and certainly
not at an error log level.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c 
b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c
index 6dd466558701..3cabfe54c669 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/ov2680.c
@@ -1191,9 +1191,8 @@ static int ov2680_detect(struct i2c_client *client)
                                        OV2680_SC_CMMN_SUB_ID, &high);
        revision = (u8) high & 0x0f;
 
-       dev_err(&client->dev, "sensor_revision id  = 0x%x\n", id);
-       dev_err(&client->dev, "detect ov2680 success\n");
-       dev_err(&client->dev, "################5##########\n");
+       dev_info(&client->dev, "sensor_revision id = 0x%x\n", id);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1448,8 +1447,6 @@ static int ov2680_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
        void *pdata;
        unsigned int i;
 
-       printk("++++ov2680_probe++++\n");
-       dev_info(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_probe++++\n");
        dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!dev) {
                dev_err(&client->dev, "out of memory\n");
-- 
2.13.0

Reply via email to