On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 15:27 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 06/02/17 15:03, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > Hi Hans.
> >
> > On 2 June 2017 at 13:35, Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >> On 06/02/17 14:18, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> >>> These 3 patches for TC358743 came out of trying to use the
> >>> existing driver with a new Raspberry Pi CSI-2 receiver driver.
> >>
> >> Nice! Doing that has been on my todo list for ages but I never got
> >> around to it. I have one of these and using the Raspberry Pi with
> >> the tc358743 would allow me to add a CEC driver as well.
> >
> > It's been on my list for a while too! It's working, but just the final
> > clean ups needed.
> > I've got 1 v4l2-compliance failure still outstanding that needs
> > digging into (subscribe_event), rebasing on top of the fwnode tree,
> > and a couple of config things to tidy up. RFC hopefully next week.
> > I'm testing with a demo board designed here at Pi Towers, but there
> > are others successfully testing it using the auvidea.com B101 board.
> >
> > Are you aware of the HDMI modes that the TC358743 driver has been used with?
> > The comments mention 720P60 at 594MHz, but I have had to modify the
> > fifo_level value from 16 to 110 to get VGA60 or 576P50 to work. (The
> > value came out of Toshiba's spreadsheet for computing register
> > settings). It increases the delay by 2.96usecs at 720P60 on 2 lanes,
> > so not a huge change.
> > Is it worth going to the effort of dynamically computing the delay, or
> > is increasing the default acceptable?
>
> I see that the fifo_level value of 16 was supplied by Philipp Zabel, so
> I have CC-ed him as I am not sure where those values came from.
I've just chosen a small delay that worked reliably. For 4-lane 1080p60
and for 2-lane 720p60 at 594 Mbps lane speed, the Toshiba spreadsheet
believes that it is ok to decrease the FIFO delay all the way down to 0
(it is not). I think it should be fine to delay transmission for a few
microseconds unconditionally, I'll test this next week.
> This driver is also used in a Cisco product, but we use platform_data for
> that.
> Here are our settings that we use for reference:
>
> static struct tc358743_platform_data tc358743_pdata = {
> .refclk_hz = 27000000,
> .ddc5v_delay = DDC5V_DELAY_100_MS,
> .fifo_level = 300,
> .pll_prd = 4,
> .pll_fbd = 122,
> /* CSI */
> .lineinitcnt = 0x00001770,
> .lptxtimecnt = 0x00000005,
> .tclk_headercnt = 0x00001d04,
> .ths_headercnt = 0x00000505,
> .twakeup = 0x00004650,
> .ths_trailcnt = 0x00000004,
> .hstxvregcnt = 0x00000005,
> /* HDMI PHY */
> .hdmi_phy_auto_reset_tmds_detected = true,
> .hdmi_phy_auto_reset_tmds_in_range = true,
> .hdmi_phy_auto_reset_tmds_valid = true,
> .hdmi_phy_auto_reset_hsync_out_of_range = true,
> .hdmi_phy_auto_reset_vsync_out_of_range = true,
> .hdmi_detection_delay = HDMI_MODE_DELAY_25_MS,
> };
>
> I believe these are all calculated from the Toshiba spreadsheet.
>
> Frankly, I have no idea what they mean :-)
>
> I am fine with increasing the default if Philipp is OK as well. Since
> Cisco uses a value of 300 I would expect that 16 is indeed too low.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> >
> >>> A couple of the subdevice API calls were not implemented or
> >>> otherwise gave odd results. Those are fixed.
> >>>
> >>> The TC358743 interface board being used didn't have the IRQ
> >>> line wired up to the SoC. "interrupts" is listed as being
> >>> optional in the DT binding, but the driver didn't actually
> >>> function if it wasn't provided.
> >>>
> >>> Dave Stevenson (3):
> >>> [media] tc358743: Add enum_mbus_code
> >>> [media] tc358743: Setup default mbus_fmt before registering
> >>> [media] tc358743: Add support for platforms without IRQ line
> >>
> >> All looks good, I'll take this for 4.12.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Hans
> >>
> >>>
> >>> drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c | 59
> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>
regards
Philipp
