On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 09:51:39PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > >>>+        /* Auto/manual exposure */
> > >>>+        ctrls->auto_exp = v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu(hdl, ops,
> > >>>+                                                 V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO,
> > >>>+                                                 V4L2_EXPOSURE_MANUAL, 
> > >>>0,
> > >>>+                                                 V4L2_EXPOSURE_AUTO);
> > >>>+        ctrls->exposure = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops,
> > >>>+                                            V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE,
> > >>>+                                            0, 65535, 1, 0);
> > >>
> > >>Is exposure_absolute supposed to be in microseconds...?
> > >
> > >Yes.
> > 
> > According to the docs V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE is in 100 usec units.
> > 
> >  OTOH V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE has no defined unit, so it's a better fit IMO.
> > >Way more drivers appear to be using EXPOSURE than EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE, too.
> > 
> > Done, switched to V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE. It's true, this control is not
> > taking 100 usec units, so unit-less is better.
> 
> Thanks. If you know the units, it would be of course better to use
> right units...

Steve: what's the unit in this case? Is it lines or something else?

Pavel: we do need to make sure the user space will be able to know the unit,
too. It's rather a case with a number of controls: the unit is known but
there's no API to convey it to the user.

The exposure is a bit special, too: granularity matters a lot on small
values. On most other controls it does not.

-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi     XMPP: sai...@retiisi.org.uk

Reply via email to