Hi, Tomasz,

Thanks for reviewing the patch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 12:19 AM
> To: Zhi, Yong <yong....@intel.com>
> Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>; Sakari Ailus
> <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>; Mani, Rajmohan
> <rajmohan.m...@intel.com>; Cao, Bingbu <bingbu....@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: intel-ipu3: cio2: fix for wrong vb2buf state
> warnings
> 
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Yong Zhi <yong....@intel.com> wrote:
> > cio2 driver should release buffer with QUEUED state when start_stream
> > op failed, wrong buffer state will cause vb2 core throw a warning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Zhi <yong....@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cao Bing Bu <bingbu....@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c | 9 +++++----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c
> > b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c
> > index 949f43d206ad..106d04306372 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c
> > @@ -785,7 +785,8 @@ static irqreturn_t cio2_irq(int irq, void
> > *cio2_ptr)
> >
> >  /**************** Videobuf2 interface ****************/
> >
> > -static void cio2_vb2_return_all_buffers(struct cio2_queue *q)
> > +static void cio2_vb2_return_all_buffers(struct cio2_queue *q,
> > +                                       enum vb2_buffer_state state)
> >  {
> >         unsigned int i;
> >
> > @@ -793,7 +794,7 @@ static void cio2_vb2_return_all_buffers(struct
> cio2_queue *q)
> >                 if (q->bufs[i]) {
> >                         atomic_dec(&q->bufs_queued);
> >                         vb2_buffer_done(&q->bufs[i]->vbb.vb2_buf,
> > -                                       VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
> > +                                       state);
> 
> nit: Does it really exceed 80 characters after folding into previous line?
> 

Thanks for catching this, seems this patch was merged, may I fix it in future 
patch?

> With the nit fixed:
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tf...@chromium.org>
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz

Reply via email to