Hi Sakari,
Thanks for the review...
On 03/15/2018 02:30 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the patchset. Please see my comments below.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 11:58:31AM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
Generalize v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev() to allow
searching for any type of async subdev, not just fwnodes. Rename to
v4l2_async_notifier_has_async_subdev() and pass it an asd pointer.
TODO: support asd compare with CUSTOM match type in asd_equal().
Right now there's a recognised need to have multiple fwnodes (endpoints)
per sub-device. The current APIs (when it comes to the firmware interface)
support this with fwnode but not with other async match types.
Just FYI.
Understood. The purpose of this patch is to support the next, e.g.
to allow v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev() to verify that an asd
(of any type) has not already been added to the notifier.
Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam<steve_longerb...@mentor.com>
---
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
index 2b08d03..c083efa 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
@@ -124,6 +124,42 @@ static struct v4l2_async_subdev *v4l2_async_find_match(
return NULL;
}
+/* Compare two asd's for equivalence */
+static bool asd_equal(struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd_x,
+ struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd_y)
+{
+ bool ret = false;
+
+ if (!asd_x || !asd_y)
Can this happen?
Not really. If the caller to v4l2_async_notifier_register() places a
NULL pointer
in ->subdevs[], there will be a NULL deref in
__v4l2_async_notifier_register()
before this check is ever reached.
I will remove this check, and add a NULL asd pointer check to
v4l2_async_notifier_asd_valid() in the next patch.
+ return false;
How about checking here that the match_type ... matches? You could remove
that check elsewhere in the function.
You could also easily do without ret variable.
Yep, done.
+
+ switch (asd_x->match_type) {
+ case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_DEVNAME:
+ if (asd_y->match_type == V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_DEVNAME)
+ ret = !strcmp(asd_x->match.device_name,
+ asd_y->match.device_name);
+ break;
+ case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_I2C:
+ if (asd_y->match_type == V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_I2C)
+ ret = (asd_x->match.i2c.adapter_id ==
+ asd_y->match.i2c.adapter_id &&
+ asd_x->match.i2c.address ==
+ asd_y->match.i2c.address);
+ break;
+ case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE:
+ if (asd_y->match_type == V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE)
+ ret = (asd_x->match.fwnode == asd_y->match.fwnode);
+ break;
+ case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_CUSTOM:
+ /* TODO */
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* Find the sub-device notifier registered by a sub-device driver. */
static struct v4l2_async_notifier *v4l2_async_find_subdev_notifier(
struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
@@ -308,18 +344,15 @@ static void v4l2_async_notifier_unbind_all_subdevs(
notifier->parent = NULL;
}
-/* See if an fwnode can be found in a notifier's lists. */
-static bool __v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
- struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
+/* See if an async sub-device can be found in a notifier's lists. */
+static bool __v4l2_async_notifier_has_async_subdev(
+ struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier, struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
{
- struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd;
+ struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd_y;
struct v4l2_subdev *sd;
- list_for_each_entry(asd, ¬ifier->waiting, list) {
- if (asd->match_type != V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE)
- continue;
-
- if (asd->match.fwnode == fwnode)
+ list_for_each_entry(asd_y, ¬ifier->waiting, list) {
+ if (asd_equal(asd, asd_y))
return true;
}
You no longer need the braces here.
done.
@@ -327,10 +360,7 @@ static bool __v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
if (WARN_ON(!sd->asd))
continue;
- if (sd->asd->match_type != V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE)
- continue;
-
- if (sd->asd->match.fwnode == fwnode)
+ if (asd_equal(asd, sd->asd))
return true;
}
@@ -338,33 +368,30 @@ static bool __v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
}
/*
- * Find out whether an async sub-device was set up for an fwnode already or
+ * Find out whether an async sub-device was set up already or
* whether it exists in a given notifier before @this_index.
*/
-static bool v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
- struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+static bool v4l2_async_notifier_has_async_subdev(
+ struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier, struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd,
unsigned int this_index)
{
unsigned int j;
lockdep_assert_held(&list_lock);
- /* Check that an fwnode is not being added more than once. */
+ /* Check that an asd is not being added more than once. */
for (j = 0; j < this_index; j++) {
- struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd = notifier->subdevs[this_index];
- struct v4l2_async_subdev *other_asd = notifier->subdevs[j];
+ struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd_y = notifier->subdevs[j];
- if (other_asd->match_type == V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE &&
- asd->match.fwnode ==
- other_asd->match.fwnode)
+ if (asd_equal(asd, asd_y))
return true;
}
- /* Check than an fwnode did not exist in other notifiers. */
- list_for_each_entry(notifier, ¬ifier_list, list)
- if (__v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
- notifier, fwnode))
+ /* Check that an asd does not exist in other notifiers. */
+ list_for_each_entry(notifier, ¬ifier_list, list) {
+ if (__v4l2_async_notifier_has_async_subdev(notifier, asd))
return true;
+ }
You don't really need braces here.
done.
Steve
