Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com> writes: > Yes, an opaque type for scancode at the userspace API can be better, but > passing a pointer to kernel will require some compat32 logic (as pointer > size is different on 32 and 64 bits).
Yes. I think we can't avoid that, but it's a single compat handler, I wouldn't worry about it too much. We don't need it in every driver fortunately. > We may use something like an u8[] with an arbitrary large number of > bytes. Yes. All of this pointed to by the pointer. > In this case, we need to take some care to avoid LSB/MSB troubles. Sure. -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
