From: Hans Verkuil <hansv...@cisco.com>

Make it clearer that the index starts at 0, and that it won't change
since future new pads will never renumber existing pad indices.

Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hansv...@cisco.com>
---
 Documentation/media/uapi/mediactl/media-ioc-enum-links.rst | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/mediactl/media-ioc-enum-links.rst 
b/Documentation/media/uapi/mediactl/media-ioc-enum-links.rst
index 17abdeed1a9c..f5cd75b42b69 100644
--- a/Documentation/media/uapi/mediactl/media-ioc-enum-links.rst
+++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/mediactl/media-ioc-enum-links.rst
@@ -92,7 +92,9 @@ returned during the enumeration process.
 
     *  -  __u16
        -  ``index``
-       -  0-based pad index.
+       -  Pad index, starts at 0. Pad indices are stable. So if new pads are 
added
+         for an entity in the future, then the indices of the existing pads 
will
+         never be renumbered, they will remain the same.
 
     *  -  __u32
        -  ``flags``
-- 
2.18.0

Reply via email to