Hi Sean,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 10:11:15AM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
> The repeat period is read from a static array. If a keydown event is
> reported from bpf with a high protocol number, we read out of bounds. This
> is unlikely to end up with a reasonable repeat period at the best of times,
> in which case no timely key up event is generated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <s...@mess.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c b/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
> index 2e222d9ee01f..a24850be1f4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
> @@ -679,6 +679,14 @@ static void ir_timer_repeat(struct timer_list *t)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->keylock, flags);
> }
>
> +unsigned int repeat_period(int protocol)
> +{
> + if (protocol >= ARRAY_SIZE(protocols))
> + return 100;
100 seems a bit arbitrarily chosen to me. Wouldn't it be better to
(re-)use eg protocols[RC_PROTO_UNKNOWN].repeat_period here?
so long,
Hias
> +
> + return protocols[protocol].repeat_period;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * rc_repeat() - signals that a key is still pressed
> * @dev: the struct rc_dev descriptor of the device
> @@ -691,7 +699,7 @@ void rc_repeat(struct rc_dev *dev)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int timeout = nsecs_to_jiffies(dev->timeout) +
> - msecs_to_jiffies(protocols[dev->last_protocol].repeat_period);
> + msecs_to_jiffies(repeat_period(dev->last_protocol));
> struct lirc_scancode sc = {
> .scancode = dev->last_scancode, .rc_proto = dev->last_protocol,
> .keycode = dev->keypressed ? dev->last_keycode : KEY_RESERVED,
> @@ -803,7 +811,7 @@ void rc_keydown(struct rc_dev *dev, enum rc_proto
> protocol, u32 scancode,
>
> if (dev->keypressed) {
> dev->keyup_jiffies = jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies(dev->timeout) +
> - msecs_to_jiffies(protocols[protocol].repeat_period);
> + msecs_to_jiffies(repeat_period(protocol));
> mod_timer(&dev->timer_keyup, dev->keyup_jiffies);
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->keylock, flags);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
