Em Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:21:34 +0200 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> escreveu:
> The SoC camera framework has been obsolete for some time and it is no > longer functional. A few drivers have been converted to the V4L2 > sub-device API but for the rest the conversion has not taken place yet. > > In order to keep the tree clean and to avoid keep maintaining > non-functional and obsolete code, remove the SoC camera framework as well > as the drivers that depend on it. > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> > --- > Resending, this time with git format-patch -D . > > MAINTAINERS | 8 - > drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 8 - > drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 1 - > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/Kconfig | 66 - > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/Makefile | 10 - > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov9640.h | 208 -- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_mt9m001.c | 757 ------- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_mt9t112.c | 1157 ----------- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_mt9v022.c | 1012 --------- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_ov5642.c | 1087 ---------- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_ov772x.c | 1123 ---------- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_ov9640.c | 738 ------- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_ov9740.c | 996 --------- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_rj54n1cb0c.c | 1415 ------------- > drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/soc_tw9910.c | 999 --------- I don't see why we should remove those. I mean, Jacopo is actually converting those drivers to not depend on soc_camera, and it is a way better to review those patches with the old code in place. So, at least while Jacopo is keep doing this work, I would keep at Kernel tree, as it helps to see a diff when the driver changes when getting rid of soc_camera dependencies. So, IMO, the best would be to move those to /staging, eventually depending on BROKEN. Thanks, Mauro
