Hello,

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 14:44 +0100, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > This more clear for debugging 
> > (hardware and software ).
> > This problem is reported by one of our customer. Your changeset
> > 13673:75331e740f61 is broke 22khz tone functionality on our cards.
> Ok, I did not expect that someone would set LNBH24_TEN in
> override_clear. ;-)
yes, this not trivial to trace all "override" definitions :)

> > We need to find compromise. Reverting the patch is not a problem ( in
> > this case we need to remove override_clear=LNBH24_TEN).
> 
> No problem. Both solutions above are ok for me. Maybe b) is more robust,
> because it allows override_clear=LNBH24_TEN to be used.
> I leaveit to you: Choose the one you like.
ok. second is choosen - it's no broke yours and our logic.

-- 
Abylai Ospan <[email protected]>
NetUP Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to