Em Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:52:12 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@kernel.org> escreveu:
> Em Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:58:34 +0200
> Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> escreveu:
>
> > PAGE_ALIGN() may wrap the buffer size around to 0. Prevent this by
> > checking that the aligned value is not smaller than the unaligned one.
> >
> > Note on backporting to stable: the file used to be under
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core, it was moved to the current location after 4.14.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> > Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-ci...@xs4all.nl>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> > b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> > index 0ca81d495bda..0234ddbfa4de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> > @@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ static int __vb2_buf_mem_alloc(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> > for (plane = 0; plane < vb->num_planes; ++plane) {
> > unsigned long size = PAGE_ALIGN(vb->planes[plane].length);
> >
> > + /* Did it wrap around? */
> > + if (size < vb->planes[plane].length)
> > + goto free;
> > +
>
> Sorry, but I can't see how this could ever happen (except for a very serious
> bug at the compiler or at the hardware).
>
> See, the definition at PAGE_ALIGN is (from mm.h):
>
> #define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ALIGN(addr, PAGE_SIZE)
>
> and the macro it uses come from kernel.h:
>
> #define __ALIGN_KERNEL(x, a) __ALIGN_KERNEL_MASK(x,
> (typeof(x))(a) - 1)
> #define __ALIGN_KERNEL_MASK(x, mask) (((x) + (mask)) & ~(mask))
> ..
> #define ALIGN(x, a) __ALIGN_KERNEL((x), (a))
>
> So, this:
> size = PAGE_ALIGN(length);
>
> (assuming PAGE_SIZE= 0x1000)
>
> becomes:
>
> size = (length + 0x0fff) & ~0xfff;
>
> so, size will *always* be >= length.
Hmm... after looking at patch 2, now I understand what's your concern...
If someone indeed uses length = INT_MAX, size will indeed be zero.
Please adjust the description accordingly, as it doesn't reflect
that.
Btw, in this particular case, I would use a WARN_ON(), as this is
something that indicates not only a driver bug (as the driver is
letting someone to request a buffer a way too big), but probably
also an attempt from a hacker to try to crack the system.
Thanks,
Mauro
