On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 10:03 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Ezequiel,
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2019 16:28:11 -0300
> Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Rework std_init adding an explicit initialization for
> > compound controls.
> >
> > While here, make sure the control is initialized to zero,
> > before providing default values for all its fields.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> > b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> > index c7d5fdb8efb4..44afda1d77b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> > @@ -1506,25 +1506,49 @@ static bool std_equal(const struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl,
> > u32 idx,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static void std_init(const struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl, u32 idx,
> > +static void std_init_compound(const struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl, u32 idx,
> > union v4l2_ctrl_ptr ptr)
> > {
> > struct v4l2_ctrl_mpeg2_slice_params *p_mpeg2_slice_params;
> >
> > + memset(ptr.p, 0, ctrl->elem_size);
> > +
>
> Hm, shouldn't we have
>
> idx *= ctrl->elem_size;
> memset(ptr.p + idx, 0, ctrl->elem_size);
>
> instead?
>
> Looks like your solution always resets the first element of an array
> even if idx > 0.
>
Yeah, this patch is poorly thought. This and the other comments make sense.
Thanks for the review,
Ezequiel
> > /*
> > * The cast is needed to get rid of a gcc warning complaining that
> > * V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_MPEG2_SLICE_PARAMS is not part of the
> > * v4l2_ctrl_type enum.
> > */
> > switch ((u32)ctrl->type) {
> > + case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_MPEG2_SLICE_PARAMS:
> > + p_mpeg2_slice_params = ptr.p;
> > + /* 4:2:0 */
> > + p_mpeg2_slice_params->sequence.chroma_format = 1;
> > + /* 8 bits */
> > + p_mpeg2_slice_params->picture.intra_dc_precision = 0;
> > + /* interlaced top field */
> > + p_mpeg2_slice_params->picture.picture_structure = 1;
> > + p_mpeg2_slice_params->picture.picture_coding_type =
> > + V4L2_MPEG2_PICTURE_CODING_TYPE_I;
> > + return;
> > + default:
> > + idx *= ctrl->elem_size;
> > + memset(ptr.p + idx, 0, ctrl->elem_size);
> > + return;
>
> If you fix the first memset() you can get rid of this one. Also don't
> see why you use return instead of break in this switch-case block
> (there's no reason to bail out early in this function).
>
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void std_init(const struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl, u32 idx,
> > + union v4l2_ctrl_ptr ptr)
> > +{
> > + switch (ctrl->type) {
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_STRING:
> > idx *= ctrl->elem_size;
> > memset(ptr.p_char + idx, ' ', ctrl->minimum);
> > ptr.p_char[idx + ctrl->minimum] = '\0';
> > - break;
> > + return;
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_INTEGER64:
> > ptr.p_s64[idx] = ctrl->default_value;
> > - break;
> > + return;
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_INTEGER:
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_INTEGER_MENU:
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_MENU:
> > @@ -1533,32 +1557,21 @@ static void std_init(const struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl,
> > u32 idx,
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_BUTTON:
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_CTRL_CLASS:
> > ptr.p_s32[idx] = ctrl->default_value;
> > - break;
> > + return;
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U8:
> > ptr.p_u8[idx] = ctrl->default_value;
> > - break;
> > + return;
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U16:
> > ptr.p_u16[idx] = ctrl->default_value;
> > - break;
> > + return;
> > case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U32:
> > ptr.p_u32[idx] = ctrl->default_value;
> > - break;
> > - case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_MPEG2_SLICE_PARAMS:
> > - p_mpeg2_slice_params = ptr.p;
> > - /* 4:2:0 */
> > - p_mpeg2_slice_params->sequence.chroma_format = 1;
> > - /* 8 bits */
> > - p_mpeg2_slice_params->picture.intra_dc_precision = 0;
> > - /* interlaced top field */
> > - p_mpeg2_slice_params->picture.picture_structure = 1;
> > - p_mpeg2_slice_params->picture.picture_coding_type =
> > - V4L2_MPEG2_PICTURE_CODING_TYPE_I;
> > - break;
> > + return;
> > default:
> > - idx *= ctrl->elem_size;
> > - memset(ptr.p + idx, 0, ctrl->elem_size);
> > - break;
> > + std_init_compound(ctrl, idx, ptr);
> > + return;
>
> Same comment here: I see no reasons to have return instead of break.
>
> > }
> > +
>
> You can get rid of this blank line.
>
> > }
> >
> > static void std_log(const struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
>
> Regards,
>
> Boris
