Hi Sakari, On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:02:25PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Instead of using the convenience function > v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints(), parse the endpoints and set > up the async sub-devices without using callbacks. While this adds a little > bit of code, it makes parsing the endpoints quite a bit more simple and > gives more control to the driver over the process. The parsing assumes > D-PHY instead of letting the V4L2 fwnode framework guess it. > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c | 92 > +++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c > b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c > index 690d3bd08ddd..40e8b8617f55 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c > +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.c > @@ -1475,36 +1475,51 @@ static const struct v4l2_async_notifier_operations > cio2_async_ops = { > .complete = cio2_notifier_complete, > }; > > -static int cio2_fwnode_parse(struct device *dev, > - struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint *vep, > - struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd) > +static int cio2_parse_firmware(struct cio2_device *cio2) > { > - struct sensor_async_subdev *s_asd = > - container_of(asd, struct sensor_async_subdev, asd); > + unsigned int i; > + int ret; > > - if (vep->bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) { > - dev_err(dev, "Only CSI2 bus type is currently supported\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + for (i = 0; i < CIO2_NUM_PORTS; i++) { > + struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint vep = { > + .bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY > + }; > + struct sensor_async_subdev *s_asd = NULL; > + struct fwnode_handle *ep; > > - s_asd->csi2.port = vep->base.port; > - s_asd->csi2.lanes = vep->bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes; > + ep = fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id( > + dev_fwnode(&cio2->pci_dev->dev), i, 0, > + FWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NEXT); > > - return 0; > -} > + if (!ep) > + continue; > > -static int cio2_notifier_init(struct cio2_device *cio2) > -{ > - int ret; > + ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(ep, &vep); > + if (ret) > + goto err_parse; > > - v4l2_async_notifier_init(&cio2->notifier); > + s_asd = kzalloc(sizeof(*s_asd), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!s_asd) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto err_parse; > + } > > - ret = v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints(
How would you feel trying to remove this function completely? There are only 2 users mainline (rcar-vin and sunxi) and this is 'yet another way to parse an endpoint and add it to a notifier async list'. I would say, stabilizing on the use of one of the three v4l2_async_notifier_add_ versions could be desirable... > - &cio2->pci_dev->dev, &cio2->notifier, > - sizeof(struct sensor_async_subdev), > - cio2_fwnode_parse); > - if (ret < 0) > - goto out; > + s_asd->csi2.port = vep.base.port; > + s_asd->csi2.lanes = vep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes; > + > + ret = v4l2_async_notifier_add_fwnode_remote_subdev( > + &cio2->notifier, ep, &s_asd->asd); > + fwnode_handle_put(ep); > + if (ret) > + goto err_parse; > + > + continue; > + > +err_parse: > + fwnode_handle_put(ep); Won't the notifier cleanup put this device node for us? This apart, for the patch itself: Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <[email protected]> Thanks j > + kfree(s_asd); > + return ret; > + } > > /* > * Proceed even without sensors connected to allow the device to > @@ -1512,25 +1527,13 @@ static int cio2_notifier_init(struct cio2_device > *cio2) > */ > cio2->notifier.ops = &cio2_async_ops; > ret = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&cio2->v4l2_dev, &cio2->notifier); > - if (ret) { > + if (ret) > dev_err(&cio2->pci_dev->dev, > "failed to register async notifier : %d\n", ret); > - goto out; > - } > - > -out: > - if (ret) > - v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier); > > return ret; > } > > -static void cio2_notifier_exit(struct cio2_device *cio2) > -{ > - v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&cio2->notifier); > - v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier); > -} > - > /**************** Queue initialization ****************/ > static const struct media_entity_operations cio2_media_ops = { > .link_validate = v4l2_subdev_link_validate, > @@ -1814,16 +1817,18 @@ static int cio2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, > if (r) > goto fail_v4l2_device_unregister; > > + v4l2_async_notifier_init(&cio2->notifier); > + > /* Register notifier for subdevices we care */ > - r = cio2_notifier_init(cio2); > + r = cio2_parse_firmware(cio2); > if (r) > - goto fail_cio2_queue_exit; > + goto fail_clean_notifier; > > r = devm_request_irq(&pci_dev->dev, pci_dev->irq, cio2_irq, > IRQF_SHARED, CIO2_NAME, cio2); > if (r) { > dev_err(&pci_dev->dev, "failed to request IRQ (%d)\n", r); > - goto fail; > + goto fail_clean_notifier; > } > > pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pci_dev->dev); > @@ -1831,9 +1836,9 @@ static int cio2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, > > return 0; > > -fail: > - cio2_notifier_exit(cio2); > -fail_cio2_queue_exit: > +fail_clean_notifier: > + v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&cio2->notifier); > + v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier); > cio2_queues_exit(cio2); > fail_v4l2_device_unregister: > v4l2_device_unregister(&cio2->v4l2_dev); > @@ -1852,7 +1857,8 @@ static void cio2_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pci_dev) > struct cio2_device *cio2 = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); > > media_device_unregister(&cio2->media_dev); > - cio2_notifier_exit(cio2); > + v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&cio2->notifier); > + v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&cio2->notifier); > cio2_queues_exit(cio2); > cio2_fbpt_exit_dummy(cio2); > v4l2_device_unregister(&cio2->v4l2_dev); > -- > 2.11.0 >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
