On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 13:19 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:47 PM Jerry-ch Chen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 16:33 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:00 AM Jerry-ch Chen
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Tomasz,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 14:36 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > > Hi Jerry,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 6:18 PM Jerry-ch Chen
> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Tomasz,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 16:28 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Jerry,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:41:12PM +0800, Jerry-ch Chen wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > static int mtk_fd_vb2_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq,
> > > > unsigned int *num_buffers,
> > > > unsigned int *num_planes,
> > > > unsigned int sizes[],
> > > > struct device *alloc_devs[])
> > > > {
> > > > struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
> > > > struct device *dev = ctx->dev;
> > > > unsigned int size[2];
> > > >
> > > > switch (vq->type) {
> > > > case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_META_CAPTURE:
> > > > size[0] = ctx->dst_fmt.buffersize;
> > > > break;
> > > > case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
> > > > size[0] = ctx->src_fmt.plane_fmt[0].sizeimage;
> > > > if (*num_planes == 2)
> > > > size[1] = ctx->src_fmt.plane_fmt[1].sizeimage;
> > > > break;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if (*num_planes == 1) {
> > > > if (sizes[0] < size[0])
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > } else if (*num_planes == 2) {
> > > > if ((sizes[0] < size[0]) && (sizes[1] < size[1]))
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > Can we just use a loop here and combine the 2 cases above?
> > >
> > > Also, we need to fail with -EINVAL if *num_planes is > 2.
> > >
> > > > } else {
> > > > *num_planes = 1;
> > > > sizes[0] = size[0];
> > >
> > > This should be the case if *num_planes == 0 and the number of planes
> > > and sizes should match the currently active format.
> > >
> > I appreciate your comments,
> >
> > Ok, I will update as following:
> > static int mtk_fd_vb2_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq,
> > unsigned int *num_buffers,
> > unsigned int *num_planes,
> > unsigned int sizes[],
> > struct device *alloc_devs[])
> > {
> > struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
> > unsigned int size[2];
> > unsigned int plane;
> >
> > switch (vq->type) {
> > case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_META_CAPTURE:
> > size[0] = ctx->dst_fmt.buffersize;
> > break;
> > case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
> > size[0] = ctx->src_fmt.plane_fmt[0].sizeimage;
> > if (*num_planes == 2)
> > size[1] = ctx->src_fmt.plane_fmt[1].sizeimage;
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > if (*num_planes > 2)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > if (*num_planes == 0) {
> > if (vq->type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_META_CAPTURE) {
> > sizes[0] = ctx->dst_fmt.buffersize;
> > *num_planes = 1;
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > *num_planes = ctx->src_fmt.num_planes;
> > for (plane = 0; plane < *num_planes; plane++)
> > sizes[plane] =
> > ctx->src_fmt.plane_fmt[plane].sizeimage;
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > for (plane = 0; plane < *num_planes; plane++) {
> > if(sizes[plane] < size[plane])
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
> Looks good, thanks!
>
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > > [snip]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > +static void mtk_fd_vb2_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq)
> > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > + struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
> > > > > > > > + struct vb2_buffer *vb;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How do we guarantee here that the hardware isn't still accessing
> > > > > > > the buffers
> > > > > > > removed below?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe we can check the driver state flag and aborting the unfinished
> > > > > > jobs?
> > > > > > (fd_hw->state == FD_ENQ)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, we need to either cancel or wait for the currently processing
> > > > > job. It depends on hardware capabilities, but cancelling is generally
> > > > > preferred for the lower latency.
> > > > >
> > > > Ok, it the state is ENQ, then we can disable the FD hw by controlling
> > > > the registers.
> > > >
> > > > for example:
> > > > writel(0x0, fd->fd_base + FD_HW_ENABLE);
> > > > writel(0x0, fd->fd_base + FD_INT_EN);
> > > >
> > >
> > > What's exactly the effect of writing 0 to FD_HW_ENABLE?
> > >
> > Sorry, my last reply didn't solve the question,
> > we should implement a mtk_fd_job_abort() for v4l2_m2m_ops().
> >
> > which is able to readl_poll_timeout_atomic()
> > and check the HW busy bits in the register FD_INT_EN;
> >
> > if they are not cleared until timeout, we could handle the last
> > processing job.
> > Otherwise, the FD irq handler should have handled the last processing
> > job and we could continue the stop_streaming().
> >
> > For job_abort():
> > static void mtk_fd_job_abort(void *priv)
> > {
> > struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = priv;
> > struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = ctx->fd_dev;
> > u32 val;
> > u32 ret;
> >
> > ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(fd->fd_base +
> > MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_EN,
> > val,
> > (val & MTK_FD_HW_BUSY_MASK) ==
> > MTK_FD_HW_STATE_IS_BUSY,
> > USEC_PER_MSEC,
> > MTK_FD_STOP_HW_TIMEOUT);
>
> Hmm, would it be possible to avoid the busy wait by having a
> completion that could be signalled from the interrupt handler?
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
I suppose that would be wakeup a wait queue in the interrupt handler,
the the wait_event_interrupt_timeout() will be used in here and system
suspend e.g. mtk_fd_suspend().
Or do you suggest to wait_event_interrupt_timeout() every frame in the
mtk_fd_ipi_handler()?
I think maybe the readl_poll_timeout_atomic would be good enough.
One more thing, for the mtk_fd_video_device_register()
Sorry that I would need to use intermediate variable here since the 80
columns check.
function = MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_STATISTICS;
ret = v4l2_m2m_register_media_controller(m2m_dev, vfd, function);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to init mem2mem media controller\n");
goto err_unreg_video;
}
Thanks and Best regards,
Jerry
