On 9/23/19 10:17 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans, Laurent,
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:11:09AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>>
>> On 9/21/19 1:48 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:36:44PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>> This is a follow-up series from Vandana's "[v3] v4l2-core: Add metadata
>>>> type to
>>>> vfl_devnode_type" patch: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/58755/
>>>>
>>>> While testing that v3 patch with a patched version of vivid that has
>>>> metadata
>>>> capture support, I realized that metadata should be treated the same way as
>>>> vbi in determine_valid_ioctls(). That makes sense since vbi *is*
>>>> effectively
>>>> metadata. So I changed Vandana's patch (hence my Co-Developed-by tag) to
>>>> correctly validate the ioctls for metadata.
>>>>
>>>> I also added two follow-up patches to simplify the SDR code in that
>>>> function,
>>>> and to fix the code for v4l-touch devices (too many ioctls were enabled for
>>>> such devices). I think the final code is easier to read as well.
>>>
>>> Quoting my reply to "[RFC] V4L2 & Metadata: switch to /dev/v4l-metaX
>>> instead of /dev/videoX]" as it may have fell through the cracks, and I
>>> don't want this series to be merged without addressing the issue,
>>>
>>> One of the reason [we didn't introduce a metadata video node type] is
>>> CSI-2 sensors and CSI-2 receivers. A CSI-2 link often carries both video
>>> and metadata using two different datatypes. From the point of view of
>>> the CSI-2 receiver or the DMA engines, video and metadata are not
>>> distinguishable, the CSI-2 receiver receives one stream with two data
>>> types, demultiplexes them, and passes them to different DMA engines. A
>>> sensor could send two video datatypes, or even conceptually two metadata
>>> data types, and this would work the exact same way, with each of the two
>>> DMA engines capturing data to buffers without caring about the contents.
>>> Given that the datatype selection happens at runtime, a given DMA engine
>>
>> 'happens at runtime': what decides this? The user-specified topology?
>> Something else?
>>
>> Is this documented somewhere?
>
> Yes. This ultimately depends on the formats configured by the user. Some of
> the formats are metadata, and with sub-stream support, these will be
> routable by different video nodes.
>
> I we designate video nodes either "metadata" or "pixel data" nodes, then
> this would need to be changed dynamically based on the format selected. I
> don't think it's really worth it, as the user space also doesn't expect the
> node type to change.
So these video device nodes will need to have both VIDEO_CAPTURE and
METADATA_CAPTURE
set in the device_caps field as returned by VIDIOC_QUERYCAP. Both are needed,
otherwise userspace wouldn't know that it can call ENUM_FMT with both buf types.
When the format is changed from video to metadata or vice versa, then the driver
will have to change the type field in the vb2_queue struct to correspond with
the
chosen format.
This also means that in determine_valid_ioctls() in v4l2-dev.c I will have to
check vdev->device_caps if this is a video node that can switch between video
and metadata mode dynamically.
Is this correct?
>
>>
>> To my knowledge there are no drivers that can do this in mainline code,
>> right? The current drivers all create dedicated metadata devices.
>
> Not right now, no. But it's just a question of when, not if.
This should be emulated by vivid or possibly vimc. That way we can ensure that
the API is correct and that v4l2-compliance can check this properly.
Next time we MUST have proper emulation and tests in place before we add
such features.
Regards,
Hans
>
>>
>> Also, this specific use-case is for capture only. Do you think this
>> might be needed for metadata output as well?
>
> As Laurent noted, the DMA engines don't know the data they handle, so in
> principle it's possible that this could be relevant for output, too.
>
