On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Pekka Sarnila wrote: > The FULLSPEED thing is really not ir receiver specific problem. It can > happen with any device with interrupt endpoint. That's the reason why I > placed the quirk to HID driver. > > However even the HID driver is logically a wrong place. Really it should > belong to the usb/endpoint layer because this really is not HID specific > problem but usb layer problem (as also Jiri Kosina then pointed out). > However linux usb layer has been build so that it was technically > impossible to put it there without completely redesigning usb <-> higher > layer (including HID) interface. But I'm of the opinion that that > redesign should be done anyway. Even when no quirk is needed interrupt > endpoint handling is a usb level task not a hid level (or any other > higher level) task. The usb layer should do the interrupt endpoint > polling and just put up interrupt events to higher layers. Partly this > confusion is due the poor usb/hid specifications. It really should be a > device/endpoint-quirk.
Yes, I still think what I have stated before, that this should be properly handled in the USB stack. On the other hand, in usbhid driver we do a lot of USB-specific lower-level things anyway, so it's technically more-or-less OK to apply the quirk there as well (and that's why I have accepted it back then). -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
