Am 08.02.2010 12:21, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: > Hi Stefan, > > First, a few comments about your patch series: > > I've committed almost of your patches, and added an extra patch to make the > driver to compile it with -git. There were other broken things when compiling > against -git. > > Several of your patches are adding leading whitespaces. Please review them > before > submitting. On -git, those whitespaces are shown with a red background color. > > I've re-made most of the patch descriptions. Please take a look on them and > try > to improve on a next time. > > We've got 2 submission for each patches. I just discarded the older one. > > I've removed the two BEHOLDER board descriptions from one of your patches. It > is > not related to your board, but it is another compilation fix. > > From your series, I didn't merge those 3 patches: > > [5/12] tm6000: update init table and sequence for tm6010 > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77451 > [6/12] tm6000: tuner reset timeing optimation > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77459 > [11/12] tm6000: bugfix firmware xc3028L-v36.fw used with Zarlink and > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/77462 > > I'll send you separate comments why I didn't merge them, in reply to each > email you've sent, > starting with this one (patch 5/12). > > > stefan.rin...@arcor.de wrote: > >> From: Stefan Ringel <stefan.rin...@arcor.de> >> >> --- >> drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c | 179 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- >> 1 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c >> b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c >> index 7ec13d5..a2e2af5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-core.c >> @@ -414,7 +414,15 @@ struct reg_init tm6010_init_tab[] = { >> { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0x3f, 0x00 }, >> >> { REQ_05_SET_GET_USBREG, 0x18, 0x00 }, >> - >> + >> + /* additional from Terratec Cinergy Hybrid XE */ >> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdc, 0xaa }, >> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdd, 0x30 }, >> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xde, 0x20 }, >> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xdf, 0xd0 }, >> + { REQ_04_EN_DISABLE_MCU_INT, 0x02, 0x00 }, >> + { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xd8, 0x2f }, >> + >> /* set remote wakeup key:any key wakeup */ >> { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xe5, 0xfe }, >> { REQ_07_SET_GET_AVREG, 0xda, 0xff }, >> @@ -424,6 +432,7 @@ int tm6000_init (struct tm6000_core *dev) >> { >> int board, rc=0, i, size; >> struct reg_init *tab; >> + u8 buf[40]; >> >> if (dev->dev_type == TM6010) { >> tab = tm6010_init_tab; >> @@ -444,61 +453,129 @@ int tm6000_init (struct tm6000_core *dev) >> } >> } >> >> - msleep(5); /* Just to be conservative */ >> - >> - /* Check board version - maybe 10Moons specific */ >> - board=tm6000_get_reg16 (dev, 0x40, 0, 0); >> - if (board >=0) { >> - printk (KERN_INFO "Board version = 0x%04x\n",board); >> - } else { >> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while retrieving board >> version\n",board); >> - } >> - >> + /* hack */ >> if (dev->dev_type == TM6010) { >> - /* Turn xceive 3028 on */ >> - tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6010_GPIO_3, >> 0x01); >> - msleep(11); >> - } >> > The above is board-specific. It is needed for the tm6010 device I have here > (HVR900H), otherwise no xc3028 command will be handled. > > The better here is to add a setup routine to tm6000-cards and move all > those GPIO codes to it. Then, add there your board-specific setup. > > I've added a patch that moves those GPIO board-specific setup to tm6000-cards: > tm6000_cards_setup(). Please move your board specific GPIO init to there. > > > >> - >> - /* Reset GPIO1 and GPIO4. */ >> - for (i=0; i< 2; i++) { >> - rc = tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> - dev->tuner_reset_gpio, 0x00); >> - if (rc<0) { >> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO1 reset\n",rc); >> - return rc; >> - } >> - >> - msleep(10); /* Just to be conservative */ >> - rc = tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> - dev->tuner_reset_gpio, 0x01); >> - if (rc<0) { >> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO1 reset\n",rc); >> - return rc; >> - } >> - >> - msleep(10); >> - rc=tm6000_set_reg (dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6000_GPIO_4, >> 0); >> - if (rc<0) { >> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO4 reset\n",rc); >> - return rc; >> - } >> - >> - msleep(10); >> - rc=tm6000_set_reg (dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, TM6000_GPIO_4, >> 1); >> - if (rc<0) { >> - printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i doing GPIO4 reset\n",rc); >> - return rc; >> - } >> - >> - if (!i) { >> - rc=tm6000_get_reg16(dev, 0x40,0,0); >> - if (rc>=0) { >> - printk ("board=%d\n", rc); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_4, 0); >> + msleep(15); >> + >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_1, 0); >> + >> + msleep(50); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_1, 1); >> + >> > The above reflects the timing needed by your device. Depending on the board, > the sleep time may eventually be different. > > >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x0e, 0x0010, 0x4400, buf, 2); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + buf[0] = 0x12; >> + buf[1] = 0x34; >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0xf432, 0x0000, buf, 2); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x0032, 0x0000, buf, 2); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + buf[0] = 0x00; >> + buf[1] = 0x01; >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x00c0, 0x0000, buf, >> 39); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + buf[0] = 0x00; >> + buf[1] = 0x00; >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x10, 0x7f1f, 0x0000, buf, 2); >> +// printk(KERN_INFO "buf %#x %#x \n", buf[0], buf [1]); >> + msleep(15); >> > > At the above, you're just trying to reproduce whatever the original driver > does, > instead of relying on the i2c drivers. > > At the Linux drivers, we don't just send random i2c sequences in the middle of > the setup. Instead, we let each i2c driver to do the initialization they need > to do. > > If you take a look on each call, for example: > tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0x40, 0x10, 0xf332, 0x0000, buf, 2); > > The first value determines the USB direction: 0x40 is write; 0xc0 is read; > The second value is the request. Both 0x0e (REQ_14) and 0x10 (REQ_16) are > used for > i2c. From the past experiences, REQ_16 works better when the size is 1, where > REQ_14 > works better for bigger sizes. > > The third value gives the first byte of a write message and the i2c address. > The lower > 8 bits is the i2c address. The above sequence is playing with several > different > i2c devices, at addresses 0x10, 0x32, 0xc0 and 0x1f. > > Most of the calls there are read (0xc0). I don't know any device that requires > a read for it to work. I suspect that the above code is just probing to check > what i2c devices are found at the board. The writes are to a device at address > 0x32 (in i2c 8 bit notation - or 0x19 at i2c 7bit notation). > > I suspect that the probe sequence noticed something at the address 0x32 and is > sending some init sequence for it. As this is not the tuner nor the demod, you > don't need those setup for your device to work. Also, this address is not > typical > for eeprom. Without taking a look at the hardware, we can only guess what's > there. > My guess is that it is for some i2c-based remote controller chip. We don't > need > this for now. After having the rest working, we may need to return on it when > patching ir-kbd.i2c. > > >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_4, 1); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_0, 1); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_7, 0); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_5, 1); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + >> + for (i=0; i< size; i++) { >> + rc= tm6000_set_reg (dev, tab[i].req, tab[i].reg, >> tab[i].val); >> + if (rc<0) { >> + printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while setting req >> %d, " >> + "reg %d to value %d\n", rc, >> + tab[i].req,tab[i].reg, >> tab[i].val); >> + return rc; >> } >> } >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_4, 0); >> + msleep(15); >> + >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_1, 0); >> + >> + msleep(50); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_1, 1); >> + >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_read_write_usb (dev, 0xc0, 0x0e, 0x00c2, 0x0008, buf, 2); >> +// printk(KERN_INFO "buf %#x %#x \n", buf[0], buf[1]); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 1); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 0); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 1); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 1); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 0); >> + msleep(15); >> + tm6000_set_reg(dev, REQ_03_SET_GET_MCU_PIN, >> + TM6010_GPIO_2, 1); >> + msleep(15); >> } >> + /* hack end >> > The above sequence is device-specific. Please add your code after I patch > tm6000-cards. > > */ > >> + >> + msleep(5); /* Just to be conservative */ >> >> + /* Check board version - maybe 10Moons specific */ >> + if (dev->dev_type == TM5600) { >> + board=tm6000_get_reg16 (dev, 0x40, 0, 0); >> + if (board >=0) { >> + printk (KERN_INFO "Board version = 0x%04x\n",board); >> + } else { >> + printk (KERN_ERR "Error %i while retrieving board >> version\n",board); >> + } >> + } >> + >> msleep(50); >> >> return 0; >> > >
I have a question, how can I implemented the reinit after activating demodulator when it use tm6000_cards_setup(). -- Stefan Ringel <stefan.rin...@arcor.de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
