> -----Original Message----- > From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:26 AM > To: Aguirre, Sergio > Cc: Pawel Osciak; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] v4l: videobuf: code cleanup. > > > > Hi, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-media- > >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Pawel Osciak > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:04 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected] > >> Subject: [PATCH v2] v4l: videobuf: code cleanup. > >> > >> Make videobuf pass checkpatch; minor code cleanups. > > > > I thought this kind patches were frowned upon.. > > > > http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/development- > process/4.Coding#41 > > > > But maybe it's acceptable in this case... I'm not an expert on community > > policies :) > > It is true that you shouldn't do this 'just to clean up code'. But in this > case we want to do a lot of work on the videobuf framework, and it helps a > lot if it is first brought up to date with the coding standards. > > It's just step one in a much longer process :-)
Ok, understood. No problem with that at all... I just wanted clarification on this coding policy. :) Regards, Sergio > > Regards, > > Hans > > -- > Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
