On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The logic in ir_timer_keyup was inverted.
>
> In case that values aren't equal,
> the meaning of the time_is_after_eq_jiffies(ir->keyup_jiffies) is that
> ir->keyup_jiffies is after the the jiffies or equally that
> that jiffies are before the the ir->keyup_jiffies which is
> exactly the situation we want to avoid (that the timeout is in the future)
> Confusing Eh?

Yeah, seen time_is_{before,after}_jiffies use accidentally inverted a
couple of times... Kinda hints that we could use better names and/or
descriptions of the functions, but maybe people just need to read more
carefully (dunno, haven't looked to see what's there for usage
descriptions already)... Anyway.

> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevit...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/IR/ir-keytable.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com>

-- 
Jarod Wilson
ja...@wilsonet.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to