On Monday, September 13, 2010 14:15:00 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 14:06 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:59:30 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:51 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > On Monday, September 13, 2010 13:44:31 Matti J. Aaltonen wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:32 +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > > > > Anyway the difference between the "completely raw bits" and the
> > > > > > > "raw"
> > > > > > > blocks is small. And I doubt the usefulness of supporting the
> > > > > > > "completely raw" format.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't intend to support it now. But we need to realize that it
> > > > > > exists and
> > > > > > we have to plan for it.
> > > > >
> > > > > OK. So we can have RDS_RAW_READWRITE and also RDS_RAW_BLOCK_READWRITE
> > > > > (or something to the same effect)?
> > > >
> > > > In theory, yes. My proposed API additions allow for this to be added in
> > > > the
> > > > future. Frankly, I don't think it is likely that it will be needed, but
> > > > you
> > > > never know.
> > >
> > > Yes but I would like to add the RDS_RAW_BLOCK_READWRITE possibility
> > > right away because that's what the wl1273 driver does now... I guess
> > > that's OK?
> >
> > Well, yeah. That's what I proposed with the new tuner caps:
>
> OK, I didn't fully get that... sorry...
>
> > V4L2_TUNER_CAP_RDS_READWRITE 0x0100 Use read()/write()
> > V4L2_TUNER_CAP_RDS_CONTROLS 0x0200 Use RDS controls
>
> But now I see:-)
>
> We'll have:
>
> V4L2_TUNER_CAP_RDS_BLOCKS read()/write()
> V4L2_TUNER_CAP_RDS_CONTROLS RDS controls
> V4L2_TUNER_CAP_RDS_RAW also read()/write()
Right! That's the idea.
Regards,
Hans
>
> B.R.
> Matti.
>
>
>
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG, part of Cisco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
