Hello Mauro,
Thank you for the review. Please see my responses inline.
Please also note that my e-mail address has changed.
On 09/09/2010 07:29 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 09-09-2010 06:19, Pawel Osciak escreveu:
Videobuf2 is a Video for Linux 2 API-compatible driver framework for
multimedia devices. It acts as an intermediate layer between userspace
applications and device drivers. It also provides low-level, modular
memory management functions for drivers.
Videobuf2 eases driver development, reduces drivers' code size and
aids in
proper and consistent implementation of V4L2 API in drivers.
Videobuf2 memory management backend is fully modular. This allows custom
memory management routines for devices and platforms with non-standard
memory management requirements to be plugged in, without changing the
high-level buffer management functions and API.
The framework provides:
- implementations of streaming I/O V4L2 ioctls and file operations
- high-level video buffer, video queue and state management functions
- video buffer memory allocation and management
Signed-off-by: Pawel Osciak<p.osc...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park<kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
---
drivers/media/video/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/media/video/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/media/video/videobuf2-core.c | 1457++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/media/videobuf2-core.h | 337 ++++++++
4 files changed, 1799 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/media/video/videobuf2-core.c
create mode 100644 include/media/videobuf2-core.h
(snip)
+/**
+ * __vb2_wait_for_done_vb() - wait for a buffer to become available
+ * for dequeuing
+ *
+ * Will sleep if required for nonblocking == false.
+ */
+static int __vb2_wait_for_done_vb(struct vb2_queue *q, int nonblocking)
+{
+ int retval = 0;
+
+checks:
+ if (!q->streaming) {
+ dprintk(1, "Streaming off, will not wait for buffers\n");
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Buffers may be added to vb_done_list without holding the vb_lock,
+ * but removal is performed only while holding both vb_lock and the
+ * vb_done_lock spinlock. Thus we can be sure that as long as we hold
+ * vb_lock, the list will remain not empty if this check succeeds.
+ */
+ if (list_empty(&q->done_list)) {
+ if (nonblocking) {
+ dprintk(1, "Nonblocking and no buffers to dequeue, "
+ "will not wait\n");
+ retval = -EAGAIN;
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We are streaming and nonblocking, wait for another buffer to
+ * become ready or for streamoff. vb_lock is released to allow
+ * streamoff or qbuf to be called while waiting.
+ */
+ mutex_unlock(&q->vb_lock);
There's no mutex_lock before this call inside this function... It doesn't
seem to be a good idea to call it with a mutex locked, and having aunlock/lock
inside the fuction. The better would be to call it with mutexunlocked and let it
lock/unlock where needed.
Hm, this might be tricky... I am pretty sure we have to hold the vb_lock for the
duration of dqbuf, so I cannot call it without holding the vb_lock. Would you
prefer to put that whole code into dqbuf? Sorry, I am not sure I understood you
correctly here...
+ /*
+ * Although the mutex is released here, we will be reevaluating
+ * both conditions again after reacquiring it.
+ */
+ dprintk(3, "Will sleep waiting for buffers\n");
+ retval = wait_event_interruptible(q->done_wq,
+ !list_empty(&q->done_list) || !q->streaming);
I think you could have a race condition here, as you're checking forlist_empty
without a lock. The better approach would be to do something like:
static int vb2_is_videobuf_empty(struct vb2_queue *q)
{
int is_empty;
mutex_lock(&q->vb_lock);
is_empty = list_empty(&q->done_list);
mutex_unlock(&q->vb_lock);
return is_empty;
}
static int __vb2_wait_for_done_vb(struct vb2_queue *q, int nonblocking)
{
...
retval = wait_event_interruptible(q->done_wq,vb2_is_videobuf_empty(q) ||
!q->streaming);
...
}
This way, you'll always have the mutex locked when checking for listempty.
Btw, shouldn't it be using, instead a spinlock?
There are two locks to be considered here:
- vb_lock - main mutex protecting most of the calls
- done_lock - a spinlock protecting done_list
Both vb_lock and done_lock have to be held to remove items from the
done_list, but only done_lock has to be held to add items to the
done_list.
After we check the done_list and find it non-empty, it will
stay that way as long as we hold vb_lock. It is possible that
new buffers will be added to it during that time, but this is not a
problem, since we will acquire the done_lock spinlock before removing
anything from the list.
I am indeed checking for list_empty without holding vb_lock, but this is
only a preliminary check. After wait_event_interruptible returns 0, I
jump back to checks:, acquire vb_lock and recheck for list_empty while
holding it. If the list is still non-empty by this second check, I
can return from the function still holding the vb_lock (so nothing can
be taken off the done_list in the meantime).
I am not sure if you solution would change things here... Since
vb2_is_videobuf_empty() you proposed releases vb_lock before returning
(and it is of course how it should be), we still have to jump back,
reacquire vb_lock and recheck. We cannot release vb_lock after verifying
that the list is nonempty until we remove the buffer from the done_list,
to make sure it stays nonempty.
Or maybe I am missing something here?
To avoid needing to have a lock also for q->streaming, the betterwould be to
define
it as atomic_t.
Right, this is a good idea.
+ mutex_lock(&q->vb_lock);
+
+ if (retval)
+ goto end;
+
+ goto checks;
+ }
+
+end:
+ return retval;
+}
+
+/**
+ * __vb2_get_done_vb() - get a buffer ready for dequeuing
+ *
+ * Will sleep if required for nonblocking == false.
+ */
+static int __vb2_get_done_vb(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer**vb,
+ int nonblocking)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for at least one buffer to become available on the done_list.
+ */
+ ret = __vb2_wait_for_done_vb(q, nonblocking);
+ if (ret)
+ goto end;
+
+ /*
+ * vb_lock has been held since we last verified that done_list is
+ * not empty, so no need for another list_empty(done_list) check.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->done_lock, flags);
+ *vb = list_first_entry(&q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer, done_entry);
+ list_del(&(*vb)->done_entry);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->done_lock, flags);
+
+end:
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+/**
+ * vb2_dqbuf() - Dequeue a buffer to the userspace
+ * @q: videobuf2 queue
+ * @b: buffer structure passed from userspace to vidioc_dqbuf handler
+ * in driver
+ * @nonblocking: if true, this call will not sleep waiting for abuffer if no
+ * buffers ready for dequeuing are present. Normally the driver
+ * would be passing (file->f_flags& O_NONBLOCK) here
+ *
+ * Should be called from vidioc_dqbuf ioctl handler of a driver.
+ * This function:
+ * 1) verifies the passed buffer,
+ * 2) calls buf_finish callback in the driver (if provided), in which
+ * driver can perform any additional operations that may berequired before
+ * returning the buffer to userspace, such as cache sync,
+ * 3) the buffer struct members are filled with relevantinformation for
+ * the userspace.
+ *
+ * The return values from this function are intended to be directlyreturned
+ * from vidioc_dqbuf handler in driver.
+ */
+int vb2_dqbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_buffer *b, boolnonblocking)
+{
+ struct vb2_buffer *vb = NULL;
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&q->vb_lock);
+
+ if (b->type != q->type) {
+ dprintk(1, "dqbuf: invalid buffer type\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ ret = __vb2_get_done_vb(q,&vb, nonblocking);
+ if (ret< 0) {
+ dprintk(1, "dqbuf: error getting next done buffer\n");
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ if (q->ops->buf_finish) {
+ ret = q->ops->buf_finish(vb);
+ if (ret) {
+ dprintk(1, "dqbuf: buffer finish failed\n");
+ goto done;
+ }
+ }
+
+ switch (vb->state) {
+ case VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE:
+ dprintk(3, "dqbuf: Returning done buffer\n");
+ break;
+ case VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR:
+ dprintk(3, "dqbuf: Returning done buffer with errors\n");
+ break;
+ default:
+ dprintk(1, "dqbuf: Invalid buffer state\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ /* Fill buffer information for the userspace */
+ __fill_v4l2_buffer(vb, b);
+ /* Remove from videobuf queue */
+ list_del(&vb->queued_entry);
+
+ dprintk(1, "dqbuf of buffer %d, with state %d\n",
+ vb->v4l2_buf.index, vb->state);
+
+ vb->state = VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED;
+
+done:
+ mutex_unlock(&q->vb_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_dqbuf);
+
--
Best regards,
Pawel Osciak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
