On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Alberto Panizzo wrote:

> If the camera was set to output formats like RGB565 YUYV or SBGGR10,
> the resulting image was scrambled due to erroneous interpretations of
> horizontal parameter's units.
> 
> This patch in fourcc_to_ipu_pix, eliminate also the pixel formats mappings
> that, first are not used within mainline code and second, standing at
> the datasheets, they will not work properly:
> 
>  The IPU internal bus support only the following data formatting
>  (44.1.1.3 Data Flows and Formats):
>   1 YUV 4:4:4 or RGB-8 bits per color component
>   2 YUV 4:4:4 or RGB-10 bits per color component
>   3 Generic data (from sensor to the system memory only)
> 
>  And format conversions are done:
>   - from memory: de-packing from other formats to IPU supported ones

did you mean "unpacking" (also below)?

>   - to memory: packing in the inverse order.
> 
>  So, assigning a packing/depacking strategy to the IPU for that formats
>  will produce a packing to memory and not the inverse.
> 
> In the end in mx3_camera_get_formats, is fixed an erroneous debug message
> that try to shows info from an invalid xlate pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimo...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/video/mx3_camera.c |   66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mx3_camera.c 
> b/drivers/media/video/mx3_camera.c
> index b9cb4a4..6b9d019 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/mx3_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/mx3_camera.c
> @@ -324,14 +324,10 @@ static enum pixel_fmt fourcc_to_ipu_pix(__u32 fourcc)
>  {
>       /* Add more formats as need arises and test possibilities appear... */
>       switch (fourcc) {
> -     case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB565:
> -             return IPU_PIX_FMT_RGB565;
>       case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24:
>               return IPU_PIX_FMT_RGB24;
> -     case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB332:
> -             return IPU_PIX_FMT_RGB332;
> -     case V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUV422P:
> -             return IPU_PIX_FMT_YVU422P;
> +     case V4L2_PIX_FMT_UYVY:
> +     case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB565:
>       default:
>               return IPU_PIX_FMT_GENERIC;
>       }
> @@ -359,9 +355,31 @@ static void mx3_videobuf_queue(struct videobuf_queue *vq,
>  
>       /* This is the configuration of one sg-element */
>       video->out_pixel_fmt    = fourcc_to_ipu_pix(fourcc);
> -     video->out_width        = icd->user_width;
> -     video->out_height       = icd->user_height;
> -     video->out_stride       = icd->user_width;
> +
> +     if (video->out_pixel_fmt == IPU_PIX_FMT_GENERIC) {
> +             /*
> +              * If the IPU DMA channel is configured to transport
> +              * generic 8-bit data, we have to set up correctly the
> +              * geometry parameters upon the current pixel format.
> +              * So, since the DMA horizontal parameters are expressed
> +              * in bytes not pixels, convert these in the right unit.
> +              */
> +             int bytes_per_line = soc_mbus_bytes_per_line(icd->user_width,
> +                                             icd->current_fmt->host_fmt);
> +             BUG_ON(bytes_per_line <= 0);
> +
> +             video->out_width        = bytes_per_line;
> +             video->out_height       = icd->user_height;
> +             video->out_stride       = bytes_per_line;
> +     } else {
> +             /*
> +              * For IPU known formats the pixel unit will be managed
> +              * successfully by the IPU code
> +              */
> +             video->out_width        = icd->user_width;
> +             video->out_height       = icd->user_height;
> +             video->out_stride       = icd->user_width;
> +     }
>  
>  #ifdef DEBUG
>       /* helps to see what DMA actually has written */
> @@ -734,18 +752,36 @@ static int mx3_camera_get_formats(struct 
> soc_camera_device *icd, unsigned int id
>       if (xlate) {
>               xlate->host_fmt = fmt;
>               xlate->code     = code;
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "Providing format %c%c%c%c in pass-through mode\n",
> +                     (fmt->fourcc >> (0*8)) & 0xFF,
> +                     (fmt->fourcc >> (1*8)) & 0xFF,
> +                     (fmt->fourcc >> (2*8)) & 0xFF,
> +                     (fmt->fourcc >> (3*8)) & 0xFF);
>               xlate++;
> -             dev_dbg(dev, "Providing format %x in pass-through mode\n",
> -                     xlate->host_fmt->fourcc);
>       }
>  
>       return formats;
>  }
>  
>  static void configure_geometry(struct mx3_camera_dev *mx3_cam,
> -                            unsigned int width, unsigned int height)
> +                            unsigned int width, unsigned int height,
> +                            enum v4l2_mbus_pixelcode code)
>  {
>       u32 ctrl, width_field, height_field;
> +     const struct soc_mbus_pixelfmt *fmt;
> +
> +     fmt = soc_mbus_get_fmtdesc(code);
> +     BUG_ON(!fmt);
> +
> +     if (fourcc_to_ipu_pix(fmt->fourcc) == IPU_PIX_FMT_GENERIC) {
> +             /*
> +              * As the CSI will be configured to output BAYER, here
> +              * the width parameter count the number of samples to
> +              * capture to complete the whole image width.
> +              */
> +             width *= soc_mbus_samples_per_pixel(fmt);

Wouldn't

+               width = soc_mbus_bytes_per_line(width, fmt);

produce the same result here? Then we wouldn't need your patch 1/2 at all.

> +             BUG_ON(!width);
> +     }
>  
>       /* Setup frame size - this cannot be changed on-the-fly... */
>       width_field = width - 1;
> @@ -854,7 +890,7 @@ static int mx3_camera_set_crop(struct soc_camera_device 
> *icd,
>                               return ret;
>               }
>  
> -             configure_geometry(mx3_cam, mf.width, mf.height);
> +             configure_geometry(mx3_cam, mf.width, mf.height, mf.code);
>       }
>  
>       dev_dbg(icd->dev.parent, "Sensor cropped %dx%d\n",
> @@ -897,7 +933,7 @@ static int mx3_camera_set_fmt(struct soc_camera_device 
> *icd,
>        * mxc_v4l2_s_fmt()
>        */
>  
> -     configure_geometry(mx3_cam, pix->width, pix->height);
> +     configure_geometry(mx3_cam, pix->width, pix->height, xlate->code);
>  
>       mf.width        = pix->width;
>       mf.height       = pix->height;
> @@ -1152,7 +1188,7 @@ static int mx3_camera_set_bus_param(struct 
> soc_camera_device *icd, __u32 pixfmt)
>  
>       csi_reg_write(mx3_cam, sens_conf | dw, CSI_SENS_CONF);
>  
> -     dev_dbg(dev, "Set SENS_CONF to %x\n", sens_conf | dw);
> +     dev_info(dev, "Set SENS_CONF to %x\n", sens_conf | dw);

This was unintentional, right?

>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.1

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to