On Friday, January 21, 2011 09:05:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Qing Xu wrote:
>
> > Hi Guennadi, Hans,
> >
> > I update this patch, I use enum_framesizes instead of
> > enum_mbus_fsizes, which is already defined in v4l2-subdev.h,
> > so, do not need to modify v4l2-subdev.h now.
> >
> > Are you ok with it?
>
> Hm, you see, this would mean, hijacking a "wrong" operation. This is one
> of those "wrong" subdevice operations, using fourcc formats to specify a
> data format on the video-bus between a subdevice (a sensor) and a sink (a
> host). Previously there have been more of such "wrong" operations, like
> .{g,s,try,enum}_fmt, all of those have been _gradually_ replaced by
> respective mediabus counterparts. While doing that we first added new
> operations with different names (with an extra "mbus_" in them), then
> ported all existing users over to them, and eventually removed the old
> "wrong" ones (Hans has done the dirtiest and most difficult part of that -
> porting and removing;)). Now, the .enum_framesizes() video subdev
> operation is also one such wrong API element. It has much fewer current
> users (ov7670.c and cafe_ccic.c - the OLPC project).
Oops, I'd missed those. Those should be replaced with enum_mbus_framesizes.
Ditto for enum_frameintervals. via_camera.c uses it as well.
> If we just blatantly
> re-use it with a media-bus code, it will be relatively harmless, imho,
> still, it will introduce an ambiguity. Of the above two drivers the sensor
> driver will not have to be changed at all, because it just ignores the
> pixel_format field altogether, cafe_ccic.c will have to be trivially
> ported, we'd just have to add a couple of lines, e.g.
>
> static int cafe_vidioc_enum_framesizes(struct file *filp, void *priv,
> struct v4l2_frmsizeenum *sizes)
> {
> struct cafe_camera *cam = priv;
> + __u32 fourcc = sizes->pixel_format;
> int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&cam->s_mutex);
> + sizes->pixel_format = cam->mbus_code;
> ret = sensor_call(cam, video, enum_framesizes, sizes);
> mutex_unlock(&cam->s_mutex);
> + sizes->pixel_format = fourcc;
> return ret;
> }
>
>
> or something similar. So, that's certainly doable, still, I think, this
> would introduce a precedent of inconsistent naming - we'll have an
> operation, without an "mbus" in the name, operating at the media-bus
> level, which is not a very good idea, imho. Hans?
I agree.
First add new enum_mbus_framesizes and enum_mbus_frameintervals functions.
Then convert the three drivers that use this (ov7670.c, cafe_ccic.c and
via_camera.c) to these new ops. Next remove the old ones since nobody should
use them anymore. And finally add support for this to soc_camera.
I can take your ov7670/cafe/via patches and test them and make a pull request
for them. I have other outstanding work for those drivers so I can take this
in as well. Since it is a big pain to test on the OLPC laptop I'd rather test
everything in one go :-)
Laurent, it is a good idea if you took a look at this as well. Especially since
you have similar patches in your media controller series:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/26821
The framesize struct is much simplified here and any new code should probably
be close to what is proposed here.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Thanks
> Guennadi
>
> >
> > -Qing
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Qing Xu [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 2011年1月21日 9:48
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; Qing Xu
> > Subject: [PATCH] [media] v4l: soc-camera: add enum-frame-size ioctl
> >
> > add vidioc_enum_framesizes implementation, follow default_g_parm()
> > and g_mbus_fmt() method
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qing Xu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c | 37
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/media/soc_camera.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
> > b/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
> > index 052bd6d..7290107 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
> > @@ -145,6 +145,15 @@ static int soc_camera_s_std(struct file *file, void
> > *priv, v4l2_std_id *a)
> > return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_std, *a);
> > }
> >
> > +static int soc_camera_enum_fsizes(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > + struct v4l2_frmsizeenum *fsize)
> > +{
> > + struct soc_camera_device *icd = file->private_data;
> > + struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
> > +
> > + return ici->ops->enum_fsizes(icd, fsize);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int soc_camera_reqbufs(struct file *file, void *priv,
> > struct v4l2_requestbuffers *p)
> > {
> > @@ -1160,6 +1169,31 @@ static int default_s_parm(struct soc_camera_device
> > *icd,
> > return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_parm, parm);
> > }
> >
> > +static int default_enum_fsizes(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
> > + struct v4l2_frmsizeenum *fsize)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + struct v4l2_subdev *sd = soc_camera_to_subdev(icd);
> > + const struct soc_camera_format_xlate *xlate;
> > + __u32 pixfmt = fsize->pixel_format;
> > + struct v4l2_frmsizeenum fsize_mbus = *fsize;
> > +
> > + xlate = soc_camera_xlate_by_fourcc(icd, pixfmt);
> > + if (!xlate)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + /* map xlate-code to pixel_format, sensor only handle xlate-code*/
> > + fsize_mbus.pixel_format = xlate->code;
> > +
> > + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, enum_framesizes, &fsize_mbus);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + *fsize = fsize_mbus;
> > + fsize->pixel_format = pixfmt;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void soc_camera_device_init(struct device *dev, void *pdata)
> > {
> > dev->platform_data = pdata;
> > @@ -1195,6 +1229,8 @@ int soc_camera_host_register(struct soc_camera_host
> > *ici)
> > ici->ops->set_parm = default_s_parm;
> > if (!ici->ops->get_parm)
> > ici->ops->get_parm = default_g_parm;
> > + if (!ici->ops->enum_fsizes)
> > + ici->ops->enum_fsizes = default_enum_fsizes;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&list_lock);
> > list_for_each_entry(ix, &hosts, list) {
> > @@ -1302,6 +1338,7 @@ static const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops
> > soc_camera_ioctl_ops = {
> > .vidioc_g_input = soc_camera_g_input,
> > .vidioc_s_input = soc_camera_s_input,
> > .vidioc_s_std = soc_camera_s_std,
> > + .vidioc_enum_framesizes = soc_camera_enum_fsizes,
> > .vidioc_reqbufs = soc_camera_reqbufs,
> > .vidioc_try_fmt_vid_cap = soc_camera_try_fmt_vid_cap,
> > .vidioc_querybuf = soc_camera_querybuf,
> > diff --git a/include/media/soc_camera.h b/include/media/soc_camera.h
> > index 86e3631..6e4800c 100644
> > --- a/include/media/soc_camera.h
> > +++ b/include/media/soc_camera.h
> > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct soc_camera_host_ops {
> > int (*set_ctrl)(struct soc_camera_device *, struct v4l2_control *);
> > int (*get_parm)(struct soc_camera_device *, struct v4l2_streamparm
> > *);
> > int (*set_parm)(struct soc_camera_device *, struct v4l2_streamparm
> > *);
> > + int (*enum_fsizes)(struct soc_camera_device *, struct
> > v4l2_frmsizeenum *);
> > unsigned int (*poll)(struct file *, poll_table *);
> > const struct v4l2_queryctrl *controls;
> > int num_controls;
> > --
> > 1.6.3.3
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
> Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
> http://www.open-technology.de/
>
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by Cisco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
