On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bjørn Mork <[email protected]> wrote: > Manu Abraham <[email protected]> writes: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch >>>> soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/ >>> >>> There are MANY posted but unmerged patches in patchwork from the linux-media >>> mailing list. What is going on (or not going on) with patch merging? >> >> Actually, quite a lot of effort was put in to get that part right. It >> does the reverse thing that's to be done. >> The revamped version is here [1] If the issue persists still, then it >> needs to be investigated further. >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09214.html > > So the patch state should be "Rejected" and not "Under Review". > > Would certainly help us all if the patchwork state was updated whenever > a patch actually was processed...
Sure, I could've pointed it out to Mauro, but handling multiple things, that slipped off my mind. Best Regards, Manu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
