Hi Guennadi,
Thanks for the RFC! I have a few comments below.
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> This patch adds three new ioctl()s: VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS,
> VIDIOC_DESTROY_BUFS, and VIDIOC_SUBMIT_BUF and defines respective data
> structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de>
> ---
> drivers/media/video/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c | 3 ++
> drivers/media/video/v4l2-ioctl.c | 43
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/videodev2.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++
> include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h | 3 ++
> 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> b/drivers/media/video/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> index 7c26947..d71b289 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c
> @@ -922,6 +922,9 @@ long v4l2_compat_ioctl32(struct file *file, unsigned int
> cmd, unsigned long arg)
> case VIDIOC_DQEVENT:
> case VIDIOC_SUBSCRIBE_EVENT:
> case VIDIOC_UNSUBSCRIBE_EVENT:
> + case VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS:
> + case VIDIOC_DESTROY_BUFS:
> + case VIDIOC_SUBMIT_BUF:
> ret = do_video_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
> break;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/v4l2-ioctl.c
> b/drivers/media/video/v4l2-ioctl.c
> index a01ed39..b80a211 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/v4l2-ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/v4l2-ioctl.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,9 @@ static const char *v4l2_ioctls[] = {
> [_IOC_NR(VIDIOC_DQEVENT)] = "VIDIOC_DQEVENT",
> [_IOC_NR(VIDIOC_SUBSCRIBE_EVENT)] = "VIDIOC_SUBSCRIBE_EVENT",
> [_IOC_NR(VIDIOC_UNSUBSCRIBE_EVENT)] = "VIDIOC_UNSUBSCRIBE_EVENT",
> + [_IOC_NR(VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS)] = "VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS",
> + [_IOC_NR(VIDIOC_DESTROY_BUFS)] = "VIDIOC_DESTROY_BUFS",
> + [_IOC_NR(VIDIOC_SUBMIT_BUF)] = "VIDIOC_SUBMIT_BUF",
> };
> #define V4L2_IOCTLS ARRAY_SIZE(v4l2_ioctls)
>
> @@ -2184,6 +2187,46 @@ static long __video_do_ioctl(struct file *file,
> dbgarg(cmd, "type=0x%8.8x", sub->type);
> break;
> }
> + case VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS:
> + {
> + struct v4l2_create_buffers *create = arg;
> +
> + if (!ops->vidioc_create_bufs)
> + break;
> + ret = check_fmt(ops, create->format.type);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + if (create->size)
> + CLEAR_AFTER_FIELD(create, count);
> +
> + ret = ops->vidioc_create_bufs(file, fh, create);
> +
> + dbgarg(cmd, "count=%d\n", create->count);
> + break;
> + }
> + case VIDIOC_DESTROY_BUFS:
> + {
> + struct v4l2_buffer_span *span = arg;
> +
> + if (!ops->vidioc_destroy_bufs)
> + break;
> +
> + ret = ops->vidioc_destroy_bufs(file, fh, span);
> +
> + dbgarg(cmd, "count=%d", span->count);
> + break;
> + }
> + case VIDIOC_SUBMIT_BUF:
> + {
> + unsigned int *i = arg;
> +
> + if (!ops->vidioc_submit_buf)
> + break;
> + ret = ops->vidioc_submit_buf(file, fh, *i);
> + dbgarg(cmd, "index=%d", *i);
> + break;
> + }
> default:
> {
> bool valid_prio = true;
> diff --git a/include/linux/videodev2.h b/include/linux/videodev2.h
> index aa6c393..b6ef46e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/videodev2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/videodev2.h
> @@ -1847,6 +1847,26 @@ struct v4l2_dbg_chip_ident {
> __u32 revision; /* chip revision, chip specific */
> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> +/* VIDIOC_DESTROY_BUFS */
> +struct v4l2_buffer_span {
> + __u32 index; /* output: buffers index...index +
> count - 1 have been created */
> + __u32 count;
> + __u32 reserved[2];
> +};
> +
> +/* struct v4l2_createbuffers::flags */
> +#define V4L2_BUFFER_FLAG_NO_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1 << 0)
> +
> +/* VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS */
> +struct v4l2_create_buffers {
> + __u32 index; /* output: buffers
> index...index + count - 1 have been created */
> + __u32 count;
> + __u32 flags; /* V4L2_BUFFER_FLAG_* */
> + enum v4l2_memory memory;
> + __u32 size; /* Explicit size, e.g., for
> compressed streams */
> + struct v4l2_format format; /* "type" is used always, the
> rest if size == 0 */
> +};
This assumes that the buffer indices that are returned by these ioctls
will be incremented beyond V4L2_MAX_FRAME. Don't you think this is an issue?
Proper handling of this still requires that once the count reaches
UINT_MAX, you do check that the buffer indices actually are available.
This might not be easier than keeping the range as contiguous as
possible and returning a set of buffer indices to the user. This would
change how the user needs to handle the buffer ids, so essentially
VIDIOC_{CREATE,DESTROY}_BUFS would operate on a array of buffer indices
rather than a single index.
I'm not fully convinced we absolutely must be able to operate on
multiple buffers at once either; most operations always work on single
buffers anyway.
Just my 0,05 euros --- as we have no smaller coins in here. :-)
> /*
> * I O C T L C O D E S F O R V I D E O D E V I C E S
> *
> @@ -1937,6 +1957,10 @@ struct v4l2_dbg_chip_ident {
> #define VIDIOC_SUBSCRIBE_EVENT _IOW('V', 90, struct
> v4l2_event_subscription)
> #define VIDIOC_UNSUBSCRIBE_EVENT _IOW('V', 91, struct
> v4l2_event_subscription)
>
> +#define VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS _IOWR('V', 92, struct v4l2_create_buffers)
> +#define VIDIOC_DESTROY_BUFS _IOWR('V', 93, struct v4l2_buffer_span)
> +#define VIDIOC_SUBMIT_BUF _IOW('V', 94, int)
> +
> /* Reminder: when adding new ioctls please add support for them to
> drivers/media/video/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c as well! */
>
> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h b/include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h
> index dd9f1e7..00962c6 100644
> --- a/include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h
> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h
> @@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ struct v4l2_ioctl_ops {
> int (*vidioc_qbuf) (struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_buffer
> *b);
> int (*vidioc_dqbuf) (struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_buffer
> *b);
>
> + int (*vidioc_create_bufs) (struct file *file, void *fh, struct
> v4l2_create_buffers *b);
> + int (*vidioc_destroy_bufs)(struct file *file, void *fh, struct
> v4l2_buffer_span *b);
> + int (*vidioc_submit_buf) (struct file *file, void *fh, unsigned int i);
>
> int (*vidioc_overlay) (struct file *file, void *fh, unsigned int i);
> int (*vidioc_g_fbuf) (struct file *file, void *fh,
Cheers,
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ai...@maxwell.research.nokia.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
