Em 14-07-2011 19:09, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> Sometimes the init routine is blasting commands out to the hardware
> faster than it can reply. Throw a brief delay in there to give the
> hardware a chance to reply before we send the next command.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/rc/mceusb.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/mceusb.c b/drivers/media/rc/mceusb.c
> index 111bead..13a853b 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/mceusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/mceusb.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/usb.h>
>  #include <linux/usb/input.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <media/rc-core.h>
>  
>  #define DRIVER_VERSION       "1.91"
> @@ -735,6 +736,7 @@ static void mce_request_packet(struct mceusb_dev *ir, 
> unsigned char *data,
>  static void mce_async_out(struct mceusb_dev *ir, unsigned char *data, int 
> size)
>  {
>       mce_request_packet(ir, data, size, MCEUSB_TX);
> +     mdelay(10);

Can't it be a msleep() instead? Delays spend more power, and keeps the CPU busy 
while
running.

>  }
>  
>  static void mce_flush_rx_buffer(struct mceusb_dev *ir, int size)

Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to