On Sunday 18 September 2011 11:45:16 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> We have fallbacks to Andrew and/or GregKH currently, but GregKH is not
> >> consistent or timely with applying drivers/misc/ patches. It deserves
> >> better.
> >> [added him to Cc: list]
> >
> > I do try to handle patches sent to me for misc/ in time for the
> > different merge windows as that directory contains drivers that have
> > moved out of the staging/ directory.
> >
> > But yes, I'm not the overall drivers/misc/ maintainer, do we really need
> > one? If so, I can easily start maintaining a development tree for it to
> > keep it separate for the different driver authors to send me stuff and
> > start tracking it more "for real" if Arnd doesn't want to do it.
>
> We need for the patches to be applied in a timely manner.
> Sometimes when there is no real maintainer, that does not happen.
I think the other equally import aspect of maintainership that
drivers/misc (and drivers/char) needs is someone who says no to
stuff that doesn't belong there and helps submitters to find a
proper place where appropriate and to come up with a proper user
interface abstraction.
I'm definitely willing to do that part.
Greg, how about we both formally take ownership of driver/{misc,char}
and you track the patches while I do the bulk of the reviews? You
are definitely better than me with the patch tracking workflow.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
