Hello,


On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:24:35 +0100, Laurent Pinchart

<[email protected]> wrote:

> We should instead fix the V4L2 specification to mandate the use of a

> monotonic clock (which could then also support hardware timestamps when

> they are available). Would such a change be acceptable ?



I'd rather have the real time clock everywhere, than a driver-dependent

clock, if it comes to that.

Nevertheless, I agree that the monotonic clock is better than the real

time clock.

In user space, VLC, Gstreamer already switched to monotonic a while ago as

far as I know.



And I guess there is no way to detect this, other than detect ridiculously

large gap between the timestamp and the current clock value?



-- 

Rémi Denis-Courmont

http://www.remlab.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to