Em 11-11-2011 12:30, Andreas Oberritter escreveu:
> On 11.11.2011 07:26, Manu Abraham wrote:
>> diff -r b6eb04718aa9 linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c
>> --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c Wed Nov 09
>> 19:52:36 2011 +0530
>> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c Fri Nov 11
>> 06:05:40 2011 +0530
>> @@ -973,6 +973,8 @@
>> _DTV_CMD(DTV_GUARD_INTERVAL, 0, 0),
>> _DTV_CMD(DTV_TRANSMISSION_MODE, 0, 0),
>> _DTV_CMD(DTV_HIERARCHY, 0, 0),
>> +
>> + _DTV_CMD(DTV_DELIVERY_CAPS, 0, 0),
>> };
>>
>> static void dtv_property_dump(struct dtv_property *tvp)
>> @@ -1226,7 +1228,11 @@
>> c = &cdetected;
>> }
>>
>> + dprintk("%s\n", __func__);
>> +
>> switch(tvp->cmd) {
>> + case DTV_DELIVERY_CAPS:
>
> It would be nice to have a default implementation inserted at this point,
> e.g. something like:
>
> static void dtv_set_default_delivery_caps(const struct dvb_frontend *fe,
> struct dtv_property *p)
> {
> const struct dvb_frontend_info *info = &fe->ops.info;
> u32 ncaps = 0;
>
> switch (info->type) {
> case FE_QPSK:
> p->u.buffer.data[ncaps++] = SYS_DVBS;
> if (info->caps & FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION)
> p->u.buffer.data[ncaps++] = SYS_DVBS2;
> if (info->caps & FE_CAN_TURBO_FEC)
> p->u.buffer.data[ncaps++] = SYS_TURBO;
> break;
> case FE_QAM:
> p->u.buffer.data[ncaps++] = SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_AC;
> break;
> case FE_OFDM:
> p->u.buffer.data[ncaps++] = SYS_DVBT;
> if (info->caps & FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION)
> p->u.buffer.data[ncaps++] = SYS_DVBT2;
> break;
> case FE_ATSC:
> if (info->caps & (FE_CAN_8VSB | FE_CAN_16VSB))
> p->u.buffer.data[ncaps++] = SYS_ATSC;
> if (info->caps & (FE_CAN_QAM_16 | FE_CAN_QAM_64 |
> FE_CAN_QAM_128 | FE_CAN_QAM_256))
> p->u.buffer.data[ncaps++] = SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_B;
> }
>
> p->u.buffer.len = ncaps;
> }
>
> I think this would be sufficient for a lot of drivers and would thus save a
> lot of work.
>
>> + break;
>> case DTV_FREQUENCY:
>> tvp->u.data = c->frequency;
>> break;
>> @@ -1350,7 +1356,7 @@
>> if (r < 0)
>> return r;
>> }
>> -
>> +done:
>
> This label is unused now and should be removed.
>
>> dtv_property_dump(tvp);
>>
>> return 0;
>> diff -r b6eb04718aa9 linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c
>> --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c Wed Nov 09
>> 19:52:36 2011 +0530
>> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c Fri Nov 11
>> 06:05:40 2011 +0530
>> @@ -1605,6 +1605,22 @@
>> return DVBFE_ALGO_CUSTOM;
>> }
>>
>> +static int stb0899_get_property(struct dvb_frontend *fe, struct
>> dtv_property *p)
>> +{
>> + switch (p->cmd) {
>> + case DTV_DELIVERY_CAPS:
>> + p->u.buffer.data[0] = SYS_DSS;
>> + p->u.buffer.data[1] = SYS_DVBS;
>> + p->u.buffer.data[2] = SYS_DVBS2;
>> + p->u.buffer.len = 3;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> You should ignore all unhandled properties. Otherwise all properties handled
> by the core will have result set to -EINVAL.
IMHO, the better is to set all parameters via stb0899_get_property(). We should
work on deprecate the old way, as, by having all frontends implementing the
get/set property ops, we can remove part of the legacy code inside the DVB core.
>
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> static struct dvb_frontend_ops stb0899_ops = {
>>
>> .info = {
>> @@ -1647,6 +1663,8 @@
>> .diseqc_send_master_cmd = stb0899_send_diseqc_msg,
>> .diseqc_recv_slave_reply = stb0899_recv_slave_reply,
>> .diseqc_send_burst = stb0899_send_diseqc_burst,
>> +
>> + .get_property = stb0899_get_property,
>> };
>>
>> struct dvb_frontend *stb0899_attach(struct stb0899_config *config, struct
>> i2c_adapter *i2c)
>> diff -r b6eb04718aa9 linux/include/linux/dvb/frontend.h
>> --- a/linux/include/linux/dvb/frontend.h Wed Nov 09 19:52:36 2011 +0530
>> +++ b/linux/include/linux/dvb/frontend.h Fri Nov 11 06:05:40 2011 +0530
>> @@ -316,7 +316,9 @@
>>
>> #define DTV_DVBT2_PLP_ID 43
>>
>> -#define DTV_MAX_COMMAND DTV_DVBT2_PLP_ID
>> +#define DTV_DELIVERY_CAPS 44
>> +
>> +#define DTV_MAX_COMMAND DTV_DELIVERY_CAPS
>>
>> typedef enum fe_pilot {
>> PILOT_ON,
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
