Hi Manju, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 20:35:34, Hadli, Manjunath wrote: > add build configuration for da850/omapl-138 for vpif > capture and display drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.ha...@ti.com> > --- > drivers/media/video/davinci/Kconfig | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/media/video/davinci/Makefile | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/davinci/Kconfig > b/drivers/media/video/davinci/Kconfig > index 60a456e..a0b0fb3 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/video/davinci/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/media/video/davinci/Kconfig > @@ -22,9 +22,33 @@ config CAPTURE_DAVINCI_DM646X_EVM > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the > module will be called vpif_capture. > > +config DISPLAY_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM > + tristate "DA850/OMAPL138 EVM Video Display" > + depends on DA850_UI_SD_VIDEO_PORT && VIDEO_DEV && MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM > + select VIDEOBUF_DMA_CONTIG > + select VIDEO_DAVINCI_VPIF > + select VIDEO_ADV7343 > + select VIDEO_THS7303
Selecting these helper chips should be conditional on VIDEO_HELPER_CHIPS_AUTO. This is what I gather looking at existing Kconfig files like drivers/media/video/em28xx/Kconfig. This issue exists with existing code too, so that should be addressed separately. > + help > + Support for DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18xx based display device. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the > + module will be called vpif_display. > + > +config CAPTURE_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM > + tristate "DA850/OMAPL138 EVM Video Capture" > + depends on DA850_UI_SD_VIDEO_PORT && VIDEO_DEV && MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM > + select VIDEOBUF_DMA_CONTIG > + select VIDEO_DAVINCI_VPIF > + help > + Support for DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18xx based capture device. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the > + module will be called vpif_capture. > + > config VIDEO_DAVINCI_VPIF > tristate "DaVinci VPIF Driver" > - depends on DISPLAY_DAVINCI_DM646X_EVM > + depends on DISPLAY_DAVINCI_DM646X_EVM || DISPLAY_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM > help > Support for DaVinci VPIF Driver. > > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/davinci/Makefile > b/drivers/media/video/davinci/Makefile > index ae7dafb..2c7cfb0 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/video/davinci/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/media/video/davinci/Makefile > @@ -10,6 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_DAVINCI_DM646X_EVM) += vpif_display.o > #DM646x EVM Capture driver > obj-$(CONFIG_CAPTURE_DAVINCI_DM646X_EVM) += vpif_capture.o > > +#DA850 EVM Display driver > +obj-$(CONFIG_DISPLAY_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM) += vpif_display.o > +#DA850 EVM Capture driver > +obj-$(CONFIG_CAPTURE_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM) += vpif_capture.o Repeating these lines in the makefile for every board that gets VPIF support seems certainly excessive. Instead why not convert the existing DM646x specific config variables to generic VPIF display and capture config variables and select these generic variables when someone chooses DA850 support. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
