Hi Andrew,

On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:18 AM Andrew Morton wrote:

> > This patch adds support for CMA to dma-mapping subsystem for x86
> > architecture that uses common pci-dma/pci-nommu implementation. This
> > allows to test CMA on KVM/QEMU and a lot of common x86 boxes.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config X86
> >     select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
> >     select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> >     select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS
> > +   select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if !SWIOTLB
> >     select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> >     select HAVE_OPTPROBES
> >     select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> 
> I don't think it's compilable at all for x86_64, because that platform
> selects SWIOTLB.

Right, x86 support is very basic, mainly for being able to test it on standard 
configuration with QEmu.

> After a while I got it to compile for i386.  arm didn't go so well,
> partly because arm allmodconfig is presently horked (something to do
> with Kconfig not setting PHYS_OFFSET) and partly because arm defconfig
> doesn't permit CMA to be set.  Got bored, gave up.

I think that all*config are broken on ARM. To enable CMA compilation, one need 
to 
select a subplatform based on ARMv6+ - for example one can start from 
arch/arm/configs/exynos4_defconfig and then use oldnoconfig.

> The patchset collides pretty seriously with pending dma api changes and
> pending arm changes in linux-next, so I didn't apply anything.  This
> will all need to be looked at, please.
> 
> I'll make do with reading the patches for now ;)

I've rebased the CMA patchset on top of next-20120222 kernel tree and I will 
send 
them soon as v23.

I hope this will help getting them merged to your tree. If I should select 
different
base for the patches, just let me know.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to