Hi Sakari,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@iki.fi> wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
>
>
> Aguirre, Sergio wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:14:55PM -0600, Sergio Aguirre wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * iss_save_ctx - Saves ISS context.
>>>> + * @iss: OMAP4 ISS device
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Routine for saving the context of each module in the ISS.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void iss_save_ctx(struct iss_device *iss)
>>>> +{
>>>> + iss_save_context(iss, iss_reg_list);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you really, really need to save context related data? Couldn't you
>>> initialise the device the usual way when e.g. returning from suspended
>>> state?
>>
>>
>> I'll actually have to revisit this more carefuly. I haven't really
>> tested Runtime PM on this.
>>
>> I think I'll remove this for now, until i come up with something better.
>
>
> Usually it's best to recreate the configuration the same way the driver did
> it in the first place. Some registers have side effects so that restoring
> them requires extra care.
>
>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * iss_restore_ctx - Restores ISS context.
>>>> + * @iss: OMAP4 ISS device
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Routine for restoring the context of each module in the ISS.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void iss_restore_ctx(struct iss_device *iss)
>>>> +{
>>>> + iss_restore_context(iss, iss_reg_list);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>
>
> ...
>
>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * csi2_irq_ctx_set - Enables CSI2 Context IRQs.
>>>> + * @enable: Enable/disable CSI2 Context interrupts
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void csi2_irq_ctx_set(struct iss_csi2_device *csi2, int enable)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 reg = CSI2_CTX_IRQ_FE;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (csi2->use_fs_irq)
>>>> + reg |= CSI2_CTX_IRQ_FS;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i< 8; i++) {
>>>
>>>
>>> 8 == number of contexts?
>>
>>
>> Yes. This loops from 0 to 7.
>>
>> Are you implying that I need to add a define to this?
>
>
> I think something that tells it is the number of contexts would be nicer.
>
> ...
>
>
>>>> + writel(readl(csi2->regs1 + CSI2_SYSCONFIG) |
>>>> + CSI2_SYSCONFIG_SOFT_RESET,
>>>> + csi2->regs1 + CSI2_SYSCONFIG);
>>>> +
>>>> + do {
>>>> + reg = readl(csi2->regs1 + CSI2_SYSSTATUS)&
>>>> + CSI2_SYSSTATUS_RESET_DONE;
>>>> + if (reg == CSI2_SYSSTATUS_RESET_DONE)
>>>> + break;
>>>> + soft_reset_retries++;
>>>> + if (soft_reset_retries< 5)
>>>> + udelay(100);
>>>
>>>
>>> How about usleep_range() here? Or omit such a long busyloop. Hardware
>>> typically resets quite fast.
>>
>>
>> I guess i'll try to fine-tune this then.
>
>
> I think it's fine to replace it with usleep_range() for now. Fine
> optimisations can be left for later if really needed.
>
> ...
>
>
>>>> +static void csi2_print_status(struct iss_csi2_device *csi2)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct iss_device *iss = csi2->iss;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!csi2->available)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(iss->dev, "-------------CSI2 Register
>>>> dump-------------\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, SYSCONFIG);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, SYSSTATUS);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, IRQENABLE);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, IRQSTATUS);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTRL);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, DBG_H);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, COMPLEXIO_CFG);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, COMPLEXIO_IRQSTATUS);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, SHORT_PACKET);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, COMPLEXIO_IRQENABLE);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, DBG_P);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, TIMING);
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTX_CTRL1(0));
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTX_CTRL2(0));
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTX_DAT_OFST(0));
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTX_PING_ADDR(0));
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTX_PONG_ADDR(0));
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTX_IRQENABLE(0));
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTX_IRQSTATUS(0));
>>>> + CSI2_PRINT_REGISTER(iss, csi2->regs1, CTX_CTRL3(0));
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(iss->dev,
>>>> "--------------------------------------------\n");
>>>
>>>
>>> _If_ this is user-triggered, you might want to consider using debugfs for
>>> the same. Just FYI.
>>
>>
>> Ok. I'll see what can I do.
>
>
> Just FYI. :-) Thinking about this agian, debugfs might not go well with this
> since the prints may be triggered by the driver.
>
> ...
>
>
>>>> + /* Skip interrupts until we reach the frame skip count. The CSI2
>>>> will be
>>>> + * automatically disabled, as the frame skip count has been
>>>> programmed
>>>> + * in the CSI2_CTx_CTRL1::COUNT field, so reenable it.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * It would have been nice to rely on the FRAME_NUMBER interrupt
>>>> instead
>>>> + * but it turned out that the interrupt is only generated when the
>>>> CSI2
>>>> + * writes to memory (the CSI2_CTx_CTRL1::COUNT field is decreased
>>>> + * correctly and reaches 0 when data is forwarded to the video
>>>> port only
>>>> + * but no interrupt arrives). Maybe a CSI2 hardware bug.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (csi2->frame_skip) {
>>>> + csi2->frame_skip--;
>>>> + if (csi2->frame_skip == 0) {
>>>> + ctx->format_id = csi2_ctx_map_format(csi2);
>>>> + csi2_ctx_config(csi2, ctx);
>>>
>>>
>>> Is configuration of the context needed elsewhere than in streamon? What
>>> changes while streaming?
>>
>>
>> Nothing I think...
>>
>> Same thing is done for OMAP3, so I tried to keep the driver as similar
>> as possible.
>
>
> Ok. Perhaps this could be fixed for OMAP 3, too. :-)
Actually, I just realized something while enabling ISP support for OMAP4.
If you have a sensor that returns something bigger than zero for
"g_skip_frames",
removing the csi2_ctx_config() call breaks VP output.
So, CSI2 is first enabled with VP only enabled, but the context format
doesn't have
a "+ VP", with a framecount = g_skip_frames... then when this is done,
and you have
a videoport, the next FE IRQ, ti hsould reconfigure the right VP
enabled context format.
This made me scratch my head several times when i wasn't receiving any
ISP interrupts :P
So please, don't try removing this from OMAP3 CSI2 driver! :)
Regards,
Sergio
>
>
>> I'll try removing this then.
>>
>
> ...
>
>>>> +/* This is not an exhaustive list */
>>>> +enum iss_csi2_pix_formats {
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_OTHERS = 0,
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_YUV422_8BIT = 0x1e,
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_YUV422_8BIT_VP = 0x9e,
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_RAW10_EXP16 = 0xab,
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_RAW10_EXP16_VP = 0x12f,
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_RAW8 = 0x2a,
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_RAW8_DPCM10_EXP16 = 0x2aa,
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_RAW8_DPCM10_VP = 0x32a,
>>>> + CSI2_PIX_FMT_RAW8_VP = 0x12a,
>>>> + CSI2_USERDEF_8BIT_DATA1_DPCM10_VP = 0x340,
>>>> + CSI2_USERDEF_8BIT_DATA1_DPCM10 = 0x2c0,
>>>> + CSI2_USERDEF_8BIT_DATA1 = 0x40,
>>>
>>>
>>> What are the USERDEF formats?
>>
>>
>> Again, inherited and adapted these from OMAP3 driver.
>>
>> Should I delete them?
>
>
> It's fine to keep them for now I guess --- Laurent must know what they
> actually are. :-) Looks like CSI-2 pixel format codes (plus VP control, I
> guess).
>
> ...
>
>>>> +struct iss_video {
>>>> + struct video_device video;
>>>> + enum v4l2_buf_type type;
>>>> + struct media_pad pad;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct mutex mutex; /* format and crop settings */
>>>> + atomic_t active;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct iss_device *iss;
>>>> +
>>>> + unsigned int capture_mem;
>>>> + unsigned int bpl_alignment; /* alignment value */
>>>> + unsigned int bpl_zero_padding; /* whether the alignment is
>>>> optional */
>>>> + unsigned int bpl_max; /* maximum bytes per line value */
>>>> + unsigned int bpl_value; /* bytes per line value */
>>>> + unsigned int bpl_padding; /* padding at end of line */
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Entity video node streaming */
>>>> + unsigned int streaming:1;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Pipeline state */
>>>> + struct iss_pipeline pipe;
>>>> + struct mutex stream_lock; /* pipeline and stream states */
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Video buffers queue */
>>>> + struct vb2_queue *queue;
>>>> + spinlock_t qlock; /* Spinlock for dmaqueue */
>>>> + struct list_head dmaqueue;
>>>> + enum iss_video_dmaqueue_flags dmaqueue_flags;
>>>> + struct vb2_alloc_ctx *alloc_ctx;
>>>> +
>>>> + const struct iss_video_operations *ops;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define to_iss_video(vdev) container_of(vdev, struct iss_video,
>>>> video)
>>>> +
>>>> +struct iss_video_fh {
>>>> + struct v4l2_fh vfh;
>>>> + struct iss_video *video;
>>>> + struct vb2_queue queue;
>>>> + struct v4l2_format format;
>>>
>>>
>>> Format shouldn't be part of the file handle anymore. There was a reason
>>> for
>>> it in the past before PREPARE_BUF --- which is also supported by
>>> videobuf2.
>>
>>
>> Ok. So should I just remove it completely?
>>
>> Sorry if i'm not understanding this PREPARE_BUF thing... What should I
>> have there?
>
>
> PREPARE_BUF prepares the buffer for the use in the device's DMA engine. This
> is exactly what QBUF does, except that PREPARE_BUF doesn't put the buffer to
> the driver's queue (calling QBUF will then do that, and only that).
>
> Together with CREATE_BUFS this allows having different kinds of buffers in
> the same queue. This didn't use to be possible.
>
> Think of sets of buffers for still capture and viewfinder. They can now
> co-exist in the same queue.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Sakari Ailus
> sakari.ai...@iki.fi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
