On Sat May 5 2012 09:43:01 Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm slowly working my way though this series today (both review, as well
> as some tweaks and testing).
> 
> More comments inline...
> 
> On 04/28/2012 05:09 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > From: Hans Verkuil<hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> >
> > Make the necessary changes to allow subdrivers to use the control framework.
> > This does not add control event support, that needs more work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil<hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/media/video/gspca/gspca.c |   13 +++++++++----
> >   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/gspca/gspca.c 
> > b/drivers/media/video/gspca/gspca.c
> > index ca5a2b1..56dff10 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/video/gspca/gspca.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/video/gspca/gspca.c
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> >   #include<linux/uaccess.h>
> >   #include<linux/ktime.h>
> >   #include<media/v4l2-ioctl.h>
> > +#include<media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> >
> >   #include "gspca.h"
> >
> > @@ -1006,6 +1007,8 @@ static void gspca_set_default_mode(struct gspca_dev 
> > *gspca_dev)
> >
> >     /* set the current control values to their default values
> >      * which may have changed in sd_init() */
> > +   /* does nothing if ctrl_handler == NULL */
> > +   v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup(gspca_dev->vdev.ctrl_handler);
> >     ctrl = gspca_dev->cam.ctrls;
> >     if (ctrl != NULL) {
> >             for (i = 0;
> > @@ -1323,6 +1326,7 @@ static void gspca_release(struct video_device *vfd)
> >     PDEBUG(D_PROBE, "%s released",
> >             video_device_node_name(&gspca_dev->vdev));
> >
> > +   v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(gspca_dev->vdev.ctrl_handler);
> >     kfree(gspca_dev->usb_buf);
> >     kfree(gspca_dev);
> >   }
> > @@ -2347,6 +2351,10 @@ int gspca_dev_probe2(struct usb_interface *intf,
> >     gspca_dev->sd_desc = sd_desc;
> >     gspca_dev->nbufread = 2;
> >     gspca_dev->empty_packet = -1;   /* don't check the empty packets */
> > +   gspca_dev->vdev = gspca_template;
> > +   gspca_dev->vdev.parent =&intf->dev;
> > +   gspca_dev->module = module;
> > +   gspca_dev->present = 1;
> >
> >     /* configure the subdriver and initialize the USB device */
> >     ret = sd_desc->config(gspca_dev, id);
> 
> You also need to move the initialization of the mutexes here, as the
> v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup will call s_ctrl on all the controls, and s_ctrl
> should take the usb_lock (see my review of the next patch in this series),
> I'll make this change myself and merge it into your patch.

Looking at how usb_lock is used I am inclined to just set video_device->lock
to it and let the v4l2 core do all the locking for me, which will automatically
fix the missing s_ctrl lock too.

I've realized that there is a problem if you do your own locking *and* use the
control framework: if you need to set a control from within the driver, then
you do that using v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl. But if s_ctrl has to take the driver's lock,
then you can't call v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl with that lock already taken!

So you get:

vidioc_foo()
        lock(mylock)
        v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(ctrl, val)
                s_ctrl(ctrl, val)
                        lock(mylock)

If the core takes care of locking then everything is fine.

All the current drivers that use v4l2_ctrl_g/s_ctrl use core locking. But this
can be a problem in the future. The only way to resolve this is to tell 
v4l2-ioctl.c
about your own lock so it can take it for you when calling into the control 
framework.

Regards,

        Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to