Hi Laurent,

On 07/17/2012 04:24 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi David,

Thanks for the review.

You're welcome.


On Monday 16 July 2012 02:17:43 David Cohen wrote:
On 07/05/2012 11:38 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Instead of forcing all soc-camera drivers to go through the mid-layer to
handle power management, create soc_camera_power_[on|off]() functions
that can be called from the subdev .s_power() operation to manage
regulators and platform-specific power handling. This allows non
soc-camera hosts to use soc-camera-aware clients.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
---

   drivers/media/video/imx074.c              |    9 +++
   drivers/media/video/mt9m001.c             |    9 +++
   drivers/media/video/mt9m111.c             |   52 +++++++++++++-----
   drivers/media/video/mt9t031.c             |   11 +++-
   drivers/media/video/mt9t112.c             |    9 +++
   drivers/media/video/mt9v022.c             |    9 +++
   drivers/media/video/ov2640.c              |    9 +++
   drivers/media/video/ov5642.c              |   10 +++-
   drivers/media/video/ov6650.c              |    9 +++
   drivers/media/video/ov772x.c              |    9 +++
   drivers/media/video/ov9640.c              |   10 +++-
   drivers/media/video/ov9740.c              |   15 +++++-
   drivers/media/video/rj54n1cb0c.c          |    9 +++
   drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c          |   83   ++++++++++++--------
   drivers/media/video/soc_camera_platform.c |   11 ++++-
   drivers/media/video/tw9910.c              |    9 +++
   include/media/soc_camera.h                |   10 ++++
   17 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

[snip]

diff --git a/drivers/media/video/ov9740.c b/drivers/media/video/ov9740.c
index 3eb07c2..effd0f1 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/ov9740.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/ov9740.c
@@ -786,16 +786,29 @@ static int ov9740_g_chip_ident(struct v4l2_subdev
*sd,>
   static int ov9740_s_power(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
   {

+       struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
+       struct soc_camera_link *icl = soc_camera_i2c_to_link(client);

        struct ov9740_priv *priv = to_ov9740(sd);

+       int ret;

-       if (!priv->current_enable)
+       if (on) {
+               ret = soc_camera_power_on(&client->dev, icl);
+               if (ret < 0)
+                       return ret;
+       }
+
+       if (!priv->current_enable) {
+               if (!on)
+                       soc_camera_power_off(&client->dev, icl);

After your changes, this function has 3 if's (one nested) where all of
them checks "on" variable due to you need to mix "on" and
"priv->current_enable" checks. However, code's traceability is not so
trivial.
How about if you nest "priv->current_enable" into last "if" and keep
only that one?

See an incomplete code below:
                return 0;

+       }

        if (on) {

soc_camera_power_on();
if (!priv->current_enable)
        return;

                ov9740_s_fmt(sd, &priv->current_mf);
                ov9740_s_stream(sd, priv->current_enable);
        
        } else {
        
                ov9740_s_stream(sd, 0);

Execute ov9740_s_stream() conditionally:
if (priv->current_enable) {
        ov9740_s_stream();
        priv->current_enable = true;
}

+               soc_camera_power_off(&client->dev, icl);

                priv->current_enable = true;

priv->current_enable is set to false when ov9740_s_stream(0) is called
then this function sets it back to true afterwards. So, in case you want
to have no functional change, it seems to me you should call
soc_camera_power_off() after that variable has its original value set
back.
In this case, even if you don't like my suggestion, you still need to
swap those 2 lines above. :)

What do you think of

Sounds good to me :)

Br,

David Cohen


diff --git a/drivers/media/video/ov9740.c b/drivers/media/video/ov9740.c
index 3eb07c2..10c0ba9 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/ov9740.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/ov9740.c
@@ -786,17 +786,27 @@ static int ov9740_g_chip_ident(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,

  static int ov9740_s_power(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
  {
+       struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
+       struct soc_camera_link *icl = soc_camera_i2c_to_link(client);
         struct ov9740_priv *priv = to_ov9740(sd);
-
-       if (!priv->current_enable)
-               return 0;
+       int ret;

         if (on) {
-               ov9740_s_fmt(sd, &priv->current_mf);
-               ov9740_s_stream(sd, priv->current_enable);
+               ret = soc_camera_power_on(&client->dev, icl);
+               if (ret < 0)
+                       return ret;
+
+               if (priv->current_enable) {
+                       ov9740_s_fmt(sd, &priv->current_mf);
+                       ov9740_s_stream(sd, 1);
+               }
         } else {
-               ov9740_s_stream(sd, 0);
-               priv->current_enable = true;
+               if (priv->current_enable) {
+                       ov9740_s_stream(sd, 0);
+                       priv->current_enable = true;
+               }
+
+               soc_camera_power_off(&client->dev, icl);
         }

         return 0;



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to