Hi Sakari,
On 12/16/2012 04:00 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml
b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml
index 7fe5be1..9d4af8a 100644
--- a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml
+++ b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml
@@ -3347,6 +3347,51 @@ use its minimum possible distance for auto focus.</entry>
</row>
<row><entry></entry></row>
+ <row id="v4l2-auto-focus-area">
+ <entry spanname="id">
+ <constant>V4L2_CID_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA</constant> </entry>
+ <entry>enum v4l2_auto_focus_area</entry>
+ </row>
+ <row><entry spanname="descr">Determines the area of the frame that
+the camera uses for automatic focus. The corresponding coordinates of the
+focusing spot or rectangle can be specified and queried using the selection
API.
+To change the auto focus region of interest applications first select required
+mode of this control and then set the rectangle or spot coordinates by means
+of the&VIDIOC-SUBDEV-S-SELECTION; or&VIDIOC-S-SELECTION; ioctl. In order to
+trigger again a one shot auto focus with same coordinates applications should
+use the<constant>V4L2_CID_AUTO_FOCUS_START</constant> control. Or
alternatively
Extra space above. ^
+invoke a&VIDIOC-SUBDEV-S-SELECTION; or a&VIDIOC-S-SELECTION; ioctl again.
How about requiring explicit V4L2_CID_AUTO_FOCUS_START? If you need to
specify several AF selection windows, then on which one do you start the
algorithm? A bitmask control explicitly telling which ones are active would
also be needed --- but that's for the future. I think now we just need to
ascertain we don't make that difficult. :-)
Do you mean only V4L2_CID_AUTO_FOCUS_START should start AF?
What about continuous auto-focus (CAF)? In case of the sensor I am
working on, face detection can work in both AF and CAF.
Continuous AF needs to be an exception to that. It's controlled by
V4L2_CID_FOCUS_AUTO, which interestingly doesn't even mention continuous AF.
I think it does, maybe not exactly in these words, but "continuous
automatic focus
adjustments" doesn't sound like a difference thing to me.
Should CAF be restarted (ie stopped and started again), to use face
detection?
I wonder if V4L2_CID_AUTO_FOCUS_START should be defined to restart CAF when
V4L2_CID_FOCUS_AUTO is enabled. I don't think we currently have a way to do
that; the current definition says that using V4L2_CID_AUTO_FOCUS_START is
undefined then. What do you think?
Yes, it might be worth to reconsider this. However, I would like to see real
use cases first where V4L2_CID_AUTO_FOCUS_START control is needed in
continuous
AF mode.
All in all, we have V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_STATUS_FAILED AF status control
value and
I can't see anything preventing it to be applicable to CAF. So it might make
sense to define in the API what needs to be done to bring CAF out of
this state.
+In the latter case the new pixel coordinates are applied to hardware only when
+the focus area control was set to
+<constant>V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA_RECTANGLE</constant>.</entry>
+ </row>
+ <row>
+ <entrytbl spanname="descr" cols="2">
+ <tbody valign="top">
+ <row>
+
<entry><constant>V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA_ALL</constant> </entry>
+ <entry>Normal auto focus, the focusing area extends over the
+entire frame.</entry>
Does this need to be explicitly specified? Shouldn't the user just choose
the largest possible AF window instead? I'd even expect that the AF window
might span the whole frame by default (up to driver, hardware etc.).
Yes it could be removed. There are two reasons I have left it:
1. If hardware support only AF on spots, V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA_ALL
seems to be more
natural than focusing on the whole image.
If the hardware only supports spots, then wouldn't V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA_ALL
give false information to the user, suggesting the focus area is actually
the whole image?
I think Andrzej meant to say that there can be hardware that supports:
a. AF where region of interest is whole frame,
b. AF where region of interest is some rectangle of size that may be not
known exactly, and position (center) of that rectangle only is defined
through AF selections.
So you would be really switching AF algorithms by manipulating AF selection
rectangle only.
That said I really think V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA_ALL is a bad name here.
I originally started with single AF mode control and then after discussions
we came up with V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_RANGE and V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA controls.
My motivation behind V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA_ALL was to provide a menu
item that would allow to select "normal" AF, with supposedly whole frame
being the AF region of interest. "Normal" AF might mean really any area
of the frame, so I propose to just replace V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA_ALL with
V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA_AUTO. This entry would naturally mean that AF area
is automatically selected by an ISP and it might not be known exactly to
user. Like in case of those superb AF algorithms that many companies
value to keep secret...
2. (Hypothetical) Instructing HW to area-focusing on the whole are
could have different results than just starting default auto-focus,
ie there could be different algorithms involved. It is just a
prediction based on my current experience :)
If the algorithm is different in that case, then it should be made a new
control, not implicitly throught a seemingly unrelated control.
We currently don't have one, and this kind of things could be hardware
specific, so this could be a private control IMO.
We have already something like V4L2_CID_AUTO_FOCUS_MODE private control,
common to multiple Samsung camera sensors. And each device has mostly
different set of options in such a control. Not sure if it wouldn't make
more sense to have standard menu control ID with driver specific entries
for all AF modes. It likely makes sense to have common patterns expressed
in standard controls though. It seems current set of AF controls, together
with V4L2_AUTO_FOCUS_AREA covers pretty much of the functionality,
without resorting to the private controls interface, that is so awkward
to use when you have to deal with multiple different devices...
--
Thanks,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
