Hi Guennadi,
Thanks for the patch.
On Friday 15 March 2013 22:27:49 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Instead of centrally enabling and disabling subdevice master clocks in
> soc-camera core, let subdevice drivers do that themselves, using the
> V4L2 clock API and soc-camera convenience wrappers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de>
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c index 4e626a6..01cd5a0
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>
> #include <media/soc_camera.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-clk.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-common.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-dev.h>
> @@ -50,13 +51,19 @@ static LIST_HEAD(hosts);
> static LIST_HEAD(devices);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(list_lock); /* Protects the list of hosts */
>
> -int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd)
> +int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd,
> + struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> {
> - int ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> + int ret = clk ? v4l2_clk_enable(clk) : 0;
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
Will that work for all devices ? Aren't there devices that would need the
clock to be turned on after the power supply is stable ?
> + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> ssdd->regulators);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable regulators\n");
> - return ret;
> + goto eregenable;;
> }
>
> if (ssdd->power) {
> @@ -64,16 +71,25 @@ int soc_camera_power_on(struct device *dev, struct
> soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd) if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(dev,
> "Platform failed to power-on the camera.\n");
> - regulator_bulk_disable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> - ssdd->regulators);
> + goto epwron;
> }
> }
>
> + return 0;
> +
> +epwron:
> + regulator_bulk_disable(ssdd->num_regulators,
> + ssdd->regulators);
> +eregenable:
> + if (clk)
> + v4l2_clk_disable(clk);
> +
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(soc_camera_power_on);
>
> -int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd)
> +int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct soc_camera_subdev_desc
> *ssdd,
> + struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> int err;
> @@ -94,28 +110,44 @@ int soc_camera_power_off(struct device *dev, struct
> soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd ret = ret ? : err;
> }
>
> + if (clk)
> + v4l2_clk_disable(clk);
> +
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(soc_camera_power_off);
>
> static int __soc_camera_power_on(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
> {
> + struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> struct v4l2_subdev *sd = soc_camera_to_subdev(icd);
> int ret;
>
> + if (!icd->clk) {
> + ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 1);
> - if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV)
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV) {
> + if (!icd->clk)
> + ici->ops->remove(icd);
> return ret;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int __soc_camera_power_off(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
> {
> + struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> struct v4l2_subdev *sd = soc_camera_to_subdev(icd);
> int ret;
>
> ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 0);
> + if (!icd->clk)
> + ici->ops->remove(icd);
> if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -563,12 +595,6 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct file *file)
> if (sdesc->subdev_desc.reset)
> sdesc->subdev_desc.reset(icd->pdev);
>
> - ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(icd->pdev, "Couldn't activate the camera:
> %d\n", ret);
> - goto eiciadd;
> - }
> -
> ret = __soc_camera_power_on(icd);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto epower;
> @@ -614,8 +640,6 @@ esfmt:
> eresume:
> __soc_camera_power_off(icd);
> epower:
> - ici->ops->remove(icd);
> -eiciadd:
> icd->use_count--;
> mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> elockhost:
> @@ -638,7 +662,6 @@ static int soc_camera_close(struct file *file)
>
> if (ici->ops->init_videobuf2)
> vb2_queue_release(&icd->vb2_vidq);
> - ici->ops->remove(icd);
>
> __soc_camera_power_off(icd);
> }
> @@ -1079,6 +1102,57 @@ static void scan_add_host(struct soc_camera_host
> *ici) mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * It is invalid to call v4l2_clk_enable() after a successful probing
> + * asynchronously outside of V4L2 operations, i.e. with .host_lock not
> held.
> + */
> +static int soc_camera_clk_enable(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> +{
> + struct soc_camera_device *icd = clk->priv;
> + struct soc_camera_host *ici;
> +
> + if (!icd || !icd->parent)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> +
> + if (!try_module_get(ici->ops->owner))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + /*
> + * If a different client is currently being probed, the host will tell
> + * you to go
> + */
> + return ici->ops->add(icd);
You don't use clk->subdev here. Why is the struct v4l2_clk subdev field thus
needed ?
> +}
> +
> +static void soc_camera_clk_disable(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> +{
> + struct soc_camera_device *icd = clk->priv;
> + struct soc_camera_host *ici;
> +
> + if (!icd || !icd->parent)
> + return;
> +
> + ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
> +
> + ici->ops->remove(icd);
> +
> + module_put(ici->ops->owner);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Eventually, it would be more logical to make the respective host the
> clock + * owner, but then we would have to copy this struct for each ici.
> Besides, it + * would introduce the circular dependency problem, unless we
> port all client + * drivers to release the clock, when not in use.
> + */
> +static const struct v4l2_clk_ops soc_camera_clk_ops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .enable = soc_camera_clk_enable,
> + .disable = soc_camera_clk_disable,
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO
> static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct soc_camera_device *icd,
> struct soc_camera_desc *sdesc)
> @@ -1088,19 +1162,32 @@ static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd, struct soc_camera_host_desc *shd =
> &sdesc->host_desc;
> struct i2c_adapter *adap = i2c_get_adapter(shd->i2c_adapter_id);
> struct v4l2_subdev *subdev;
> + char clk_name[V4L2_SUBDEV_NAME_SIZE];
> + int ret;
>
> if (!adap) {
> dev_err(icd->pdev, "Cannot get I2C adapter #%d. No driver?\n",
> shd->i2c_adapter_id);
> - goto ei2cga;
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> shd->board_info->platform_data = &sdesc->subdev_desc;
>
> + snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%d-%04x",
> + shd->i2c_adapter_id, shd->board_info->addr);
> +
> + icd->clk = v4l2_clk_register(&soc_camera_clk_ops, clk_name, "mclk",
> icd);
> + if (IS_ERR(icd->clk)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(icd->clk);
> + goto eclkreg;
> + }
> +
> subdev = v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board(&ici->v4l2_dev, adap,
> shd->board_info, NULL);
> - if (!subdev)
> + if (!subdev) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> goto ei2cnd;
> + }
>
> client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(subdev);
>
> @@ -1109,9 +1196,11 @@ static int soc_camera_init_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd,
>
> return 0;
> ei2cnd:
> + v4l2_clk_unregister(icd->clk);
> + icd->clk = NULL;
> +eclkreg:
> i2c_put_adapter(adap);
> -ei2cga:
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void soc_camera_free_i2c(struct soc_camera_device *icd)
> @@ -1124,6 +1213,8 @@ static void soc_camera_free_i2c(struct
> soc_camera_device *icd)
> v4l2_device_unregister_subdev(i2c_get_clientdata(client));
> i2c_unregister_device(client);
> i2c_put_adapter(adap);
> + v4l2_clk_unregister(icd->clk);
> + icd->clk = NULL;
> }
> #else
> #define soc_camera_init_i2c(icd, sdesc) (-ENODEV)
> @@ -1161,26 +1252,31 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd) if (ssdd->reset)
> ssdd->reset(icd->pdev);
>
> - mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> - ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> - mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto eadd;
> -
> /* Must have icd->vdev before registering the device */
> ret = video_dev_create(icd);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto evdc;
>
> + /*
> + * ..._video_start() will create a device node, video_register_device()
> + * itself is protected against concurrent open() calls, but we also have
> + * to protect our data also during client probing.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> +
> /* Non-i2c cameras, e.g., soc_camera_platform, have no board_info */
> if (shd->board_info) {
> ret = soc_camera_init_i2c(icd, sdesc);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto eadddev;
> + goto eadd;
> } else if (!shd->add_device || !shd->del_device) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto eadddev;
> + goto eadd;
> } else {
> + ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto eadd;
> +
> if (shd->module_name)
> ret = request_module(shd->module_name);
>
> @@ -1216,13 +1312,6 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd)
>
> icd->field = V4L2_FIELD_ANY;
>
> - /*
> - * ..._video_start() will create a device node, video_register_device()
> - * itself is protected against concurrent open() calls, but we also have
> - * to protect our data.
> - */
> - mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> -
> ret = soc_camera_video_start(icd);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto evidstart;
> @@ -1235,14 +1324,14 @@ static int soc_camera_probe(struct soc_camera_device
> *icd) icd->field = mf.field;
> }
>
> - ici->ops->remove(icd);
> + if (!shd->board_info)
> + ici->ops->remove(icd);
>
> mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
>
> return 0;
>
> evidstart:
> - mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> soc_camera_free_user_formats(icd);
> eiufmt:
> ectrl:
> @@ -1251,16 +1340,15 @@ ectrl:
> } else {
> shd->del_device(icd);
> module_put(control->driver->owner);
> - }
> enodrv:
> eadddev:
> + ici->ops->remove(icd);
> + }
> +eadd:
> video_device_release(icd->vdev);
> icd->vdev = NULL;
> -evdc:
> - mutex_lock(&ici->host_lock);
> - ici->ops->remove(icd);
> mutex_unlock(&ici->host_lock);
> -eadd:
> +evdc:
> v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&icd->ctrl_handler);
> return ret;
> }
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
