drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c:91:6: warning: "ret" may be used 
uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c:70:6: note: "ret" was declared here

This is real, if a remote control has an empty initialization sequence
we would get success or failure randomly.

OTOH the initialization of ret in m920x_init is needless, the function
returns with an error as soon as an error happens, so the last return
can only be a success and we can hard-code 0 there.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <kh...@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com>
Cc: Antonio Ospite <osp...@studenti.unina.it>
---
Untested, I don't have the hardware.

 drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- linux-3.9-rc4.orig/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c        2013-03-05 
10:33:29.497926362 +0100
+++ linux-3.9-rc4/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/m920x.c     2013-03-31 
11:25:54.009509019 +0200
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ static inline int m920x_write(struct usb
 static inline int m920x_write_seq(struct usb_device *udev, u8 request,
                                  struct m920x_inits *seq)
 {
-       int ret;
+       int ret = 0;
+
        while (seq->address) {
                ret = m920x_write(udev, request, seq->data, seq->address);
                if (ret != 0)
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ static inline int m920x_write_seq(struct
 
 static int m920x_init(struct dvb_usb_device *d, struct m920x_inits *rc_seq)
 {
-       int ret = 0, i, epi, flags = 0;
+       int ret, i, epi, flags = 0;
        int adap_enabled[M9206_MAX_ADAPTERS] = { 0 };
 
        /* Remote controller init. */
@@ -124,7 +125,7 @@ static int m920x_init(struct dvb_usb_dev
                }
        }
 
-       return ret;
+       return 0;
 }
 
 static int m920x_init_ep(struct usb_interface *intf)


-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to