On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de> wrote: > At Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:13:35 +0800, > Ming Lei wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de> wrote: >> > At Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:08:30 +0400, >> > Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11-07-2013 13:06, Ming Lei wrote: >> >> >> >> > Complete() will be run with interrupt enabled, so change to >> >> > spin_lock_irqsave(). >> >> >> >> Changelog doesn't match the patch. >> > >> > Yep, but moreover... >> > >> >> > Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <pe...@perex.cz> >> >> > Cc: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de> >> >> > Cc: alsa-de...@alsa-project.org >> >> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming....@canonical.com> >> >> > --- >> >> > sound/usb/usx2y/usbusx2yaudio.c | 4 ++++ >> >> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> >> >> > diff --git a/sound/usb/usx2y/usbusx2yaudio.c >> >> > b/sound/usb/usx2y/usbusx2yaudio.c >> >> > index 4967fe9..e2ee893 100644 >> >> > --- a/sound/usb/usx2y/usbusx2yaudio.c >> >> > +++ b/sound/usb/usx2y/usbusx2yaudio.c >> >> > @@ -273,7 +273,11 @@ static void usX2Y_clients_stop(struct usX2Ydev >> >> > *usX2Y) >> >> > struct snd_usX2Y_substream *subs = usX2Y->subs[s]; >> >> > if (subs) { >> >> > if (atomic_read(&subs->state) >= state_PRERUNNING) { >> >> > + unsigned long flags; >> >> > + >> >> > + local_irq_save(flags); >> >> > snd_pcm_stop(subs->pcm_substream, >> >> > SNDRV_PCM_STATE_XRUN); >> >> > + local_irq_restore(flags); >> >> > } >> > >> > ... actually this snd_pcm_stop() call should have been covered by >> > snd_pcm_stream_lock(). Maybe it'd be enough to have a single patch >> > together with the change, i.e. wrapping with >> > snd_pcm_stream_lock_irqsave(). >> >> Please use snd_pcm_stream_lock_irqsave() so that I can avoid sending >> out similar patch later, :-) >> >> > >> > I'll prepare the patch for 3.11 independently from your patch series, >> > so please drop this one. >> >> OK, thanks for dealing with that. >> >> > >> > >> > BTW, the word "cleanup" in the subject is inappropriate. This is >> > rather a fix together with the core change. >> >> It is a cleanup since the patchset only addresses lock problem which >> is caused by the tasklet conversion. > > Well, the conversion to irqsave() is needed for the future drop of > irq_save() in the caller, right? Then this isn't a cleanup but a > preparation for movement ahead.
Sounds more accurate, and I will change the title in next round, :-) Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html