Em Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:00:42 +0200
Sylwester Nawrocki <[email protected]> escreveu:

> On 08/27/2013 06:00 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> > > The thing is that you're wanting to use the clock register as a way to
> >>> > > detect that the device got initialized.
> >> > 
> >> > I'm not sure to follow you there, I don't think that's how I want to use 
> >> > the 
> >> > clock. Could you please elaborate ?
> >
> > As Sylwester pointed, the lack of clock register makes ov2640 to defer
> > probing, as it assumes that the sensor is not ready.
> 
> Hmm, actually there are two drivers here - the sensor driver defers its
> probing() when a clock provided by the bridge driver is missing. Thus
> let's not misunderstand it that missing clock is used as an indication
> of the sensor not being ready. It merely means that the clock provider
> (which in this case is the bridge driver) has not initialized yet.
> It's pretty standard situation, the sensor doesn't know who provides
> the clock but it knows it needs the clock and when that's missing it
> defers its probe().

On an always on clock, there's no sense on defer probe.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sylwester


-- 

Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to