On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:12:54AM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
...
> Also I am not aware of a reason why clamp_t is better than clamp (I am
> probably wrong here....). If there is a good reason for not using
> clamp_t I have no problem in reviewing again the patch and use
> unsigned constants.

clamp_t() should only be used if you need to force a type for the clamping
operation. It's always better if you don't have to, and all the arguments
are of the same type: type casting can have an effect on the end result and
bugs related to that can be difficult to find.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi     XMPP: sai...@retiisi.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to