On 12 February 2014 01:39, James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 20:14:19 Antti Seppälä wrote:
>> Are you working on the wakeup protocol selector sysfs interface?
>
> I gave it a try yesterday, but it's a bit of a work in progress at the moment.
> It's also a bit more effort for img-ir to work properly with it, so I'd
> probably just limit the allowed wakeup protocols to the enabled normal
> protocol at first in img-ir.
>
> Here's what I have (hopefully kmail won't corrupt it), feel free to take and
> improve/fix it. I'm not keen on the invasiveness of the
> allowed_protos/enabled_protocols change (which isn't complete), but it
> should probably be abstracted at some point anyway.
>

Hi James.

In general the approach here looks good. At least I couldn't figure
any easy way to be less intrusive towards drivers/decoders and still
support wakeup filters.

I've just sent a new version of my rc-5-sz encoder patches for review.

I was thinking that once you are finished with the wakeup protocol
sysfs interface maybe you could combine my patchset and your changes
into a single "review patch" series and send it to the list? That
would keep the entire wakeup filter series easier to track.

Br,
-Antti
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to