On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:29:53AM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
>On 29/03/14 16:11, David Härdeman wrote:
>> The generic scancode filtering has questionable value and makes it
>> impossible to determine from userspace if there is an actual
>> scancode hw filter present or not.
>>
>> So revert the generic parts.
>>
>> Based on a patch from James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com>, but this
>> version also makes sure that only the valid sysfs files are created
>> in the first place.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <da...@hardeman.nu>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c | 66
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> include/media/rc-core.h | 2 +
>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c b/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
>> index ba955ac..8675e07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/rc-main.c
>> @@ -634,7 +634,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rc_repeat);
>> static void ir_do_keydown(struct rc_dev *dev, enum rc_type protocol,
>> u32 scancode, u32 keycode, u8 toggle)
>> {
>> - struct rc_scancode_filter *filter;
>> bool new_event = (!dev->keypressed ||
>> dev->last_protocol != protocol ||
>> dev->last_scancode != scancode ||
>> @@ -643,11 +642,6 @@ static void ir_do_keydown(struct rc_dev *dev, enum
>> rc_type protocol,
>> if (new_event && dev->keypressed)
>> ir_do_keyup(dev, false);
>>
>> - /* Generic scancode filtering */
>> - filter = &dev->scancode_filters[RC_FILTER_NORMAL];
>> - if (filter->mask && ((scancode ^ filter->data) & filter->mask))
>> - return;
>> -
>> input_event(dev->input_dev, EV_MSC, MSC_SCAN, scancode);
>>
>> if (new_event && keycode != KEY_RESERVED) {
>> @@ -1017,14 +1011,11 @@ static ssize_t store_protocols(struct device *device,
>> set_filter = (fattr->type == RC_FILTER_NORMAL)
>> ? dev->s_filter : dev->s_wakeup_filter;
>>
>> - if (old_type != type && filter->mask) {
>> + if (set_filter && old_type != type && filter->mask) {
>> local_filter = *filter;
>> if (!type) {
>> /* no protocol => clear filter */
>> ret = -1;
>> - } else if (!set_filter) {
>> - /* generic filtering => accept any filter */
>> - ret = 0;
>> } else {
>> /* hardware filtering => try setting, otherwise clear */
>> ret = set_filter(dev, &local_filter);
>> @@ -1033,8 +1024,7 @@ static ssize_t store_protocols(struct device *device,
>> /* clear the filter */
>> local_filter.data = 0;
>> local_filter.mask = 0;
>> - if (set_filter)
>> - set_filter(dev, &local_filter);
>> + set_filter(dev, &local_filter);
>> }
>>
>> /* commit the new filter */
>> @@ -1078,7 +1068,9 @@ static ssize_t show_filter(struct device *device,
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
>> - if (fattr->mask)
>> + if (!dev->s_filter)
>> + val = 0;
>
>I suspect this should take s_wakeup_filter into account depending on
>fattr->type. It's probably quite common to have a wakeup filter but no
>normal filter.
Thanks for spotting that.
>The rest looks reasonable, though it could easily have been a separate
>patch (at least as long as the show/store callbacks don't assume the
>presence of the callbacks they use).
Yes, I wanted to avoid there being more intermediary states than
necessary (i.e. first a read/writable sysfs file, then one that can't be
read/written, then the file disappears...).
Can still respin it on top of your patch if you prefer.
--
David Härdeman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
